This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] SH50 - cold4B AA

    • chocular77
      chocular77
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.06.2010 Posts: 1,102

      $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
      HEM
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      Stacks:
      UTG ($50.50) 101bb
      UTG+1 ($83.45) 167bb
      CO ($68.75) 138bb
      BTN ($49.25) 99bb
      SB ($17.05) 34bb
      cincinkid (BB) ($111.35) 223bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) cincinkid is BB A A
      2 folds, CO bets $1.75, BTN raises to $6, 1 fold, cincinkid raises to $13.25, CO folds, BTN calls $7.75

      Since my 4B shows a lot of strength i made the smallest size possible since i always get folds in this spots.
      But i think i should still rather 4B ~$15

      Flop: T 6 9 ($29.50, 2 players)
      cincinkid bets $15, BTN goes all-in $35.50, cincinkid calls $20.50

      Final Pot: $100.50
  • 5 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello chocular77,

      Preflop: 4bet should be bigger $15.
      Postflop: But afterwards not much to do, we can't really get away while he also has even KK in his range.

      Best Regards.
    • Farmarchist
      Farmarchist
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.12.2010 Posts: 14,640
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
    • ains21
      ains21
      Bronze
      Joined: 04.06.2011 Posts: 303
      Originally posted by veriz
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
      Hello Veriz,

      I'm probably being stupid but what do you mean he's getting close to 7,5:1 here? He has to call $7.25 to win $21.25 which is like 3:1; and then implied odds?

      Thanks.
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by ains21
      Originally posted by veriz
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
      Hello Veriz,

      I'm probably being stupid but what do you mean he's getting close to 7,5:1 here? He has to call $7.25 to win $21.25 which is like 3:1; and then implied odds?

      Thanks.
      We are not talking about implied odds. :P We are talking about set mining, how do you calculate Call20 rule? :)