[NL20-NL50] SH50 - cold4B AA

    • chocular77
      chocular77
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.06.2010 Posts: 1,102

      $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem
      HEM
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      Stacks:
      UTG ($50.50) 101bb
      UTG+1 ($83.45) 167bb
      CO ($68.75) 138bb
      BTN ($49.25) 99bb
      SB ($17.05) 34bb
      cincinkid (BB) ($111.35) 223bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) cincinkid is BB A A
      2 folds, CO bets $1.75, BTN raises to $6, 1 fold, cincinkid raises to $13.25, CO folds, BTN calls $7.75

      Since my 4B shows a lot of strength i made the smallest size possible since i always get folds in this spots.
      But i think i should still rather 4B ~$15

      Flop: T 6 9 ($29.50, 2 players)
      cincinkid bets $15, BTN goes all-in $35.50, cincinkid calls $20.50

      Final Pot: $100.50
  • 5 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello chocular77,

      Preflop: 4bet should be bigger $15.
      Postflop: But afterwards not much to do, we can't really get away while he also has even KK in his range.

      Best Regards.
    • Farmarchist
      Farmarchist
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.12.2010 Posts: 14,640
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
    • ains21
      ains21
      Bronze
      Joined: 04.06.2011 Posts: 303
      Originally posted by veriz
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
      Hello Veriz,

      I'm probably being stupid but what do you mean he's getting close to 7,5:1 here? He has to call $7.25 to win $21.25 which is like 3:1; and then implied odds?

      Thanks.
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by ains21
      Originally posted by veriz
      Originally posted by Farmarchist
      Can I ask you why it should be 15? Because with this size he still doesn't get the odds to call with any pair. + Now our bluffs can be cheaper.
      Well, he is getting pretty close to 7,5:1 which is kinda even correct for set-mining. But of course it's not that huge difference. Somehow I assumed it's vs CO stack.
      Hello Veriz,

      I'm probably being stupid but what do you mean he's getting close to 7,5:1 here? He has to call $7.25 to win $21.25 which is like 3:1; and then implied odds?

      Thanks.
      We are not talking about implied odds. :P We are talking about set mining, how do you calculate Call20 rule? :)