[NL2-NL10] NL10: K9 TP <> midstack

    • Avatars91
      Joined: 18.12.2009 Posts: 2,689
      Poker Stars $10.00 No Limit Hold'em - 4 players - View hand 1862003
      DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

      SB: $8.18 - VPIP: 38, PFR: 13, 3B: 0, AF: 6,0, Hands: 16
      BB: $3.96 - VPIP: 24, PFR: 0, 3B: 0, AF: 1,0, Hands: 33
      Hero (CO): $11.84 - VPIP: 22, PFR: 19, 3B: 5, AF: 4,6, Hands: 51970
      BTN: $9.92 - VPIP: 18, PFR: 13, 3B: 4, AF: 2,5, Hands: 253

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is CO with K :club: 9 :spade:
      Hero raises to $0.30, 1 fold, SB calls $0.25, BB calls $0.20

      Flop: ($0.90) 2 :heart: K :diamond: J :heart: (3 players)
      SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $0.60, SB folds, BB calls $0.60

      Turn: ($2.10) 8 :diamond: (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero checks

      River: ($2.10) 5 :heart: (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $1.10, BB folds

      Flop: could maybe bet a bit bigger? ~0.70$ at least?
      Turn: not really sure which line is best. The sample is too small to clearly state that villain is passive but if I bet I am sort of committed since he can still push with a FD or Jx. I am not too happy about calling a moderately sized river bet if I check behind so I should maybe just simply bet and get it in.

      As played though: is my valuebet on the river not too thin because of the completed flush? Could it be at least doable if river was a blank (we get called by Jx maybe weaker pairs?
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Avatars91,

      I don't get it, you don't Bet the turn for value where you could get called from draws but you Bet the river for value when draw gets there. :D Do you think this makes sense?

      Also if you opening such hands this means you are assuming you doing it for value, as we discussed, didn't we? :D Which means 2nd barreling for value of course. :)

      Best Regards.