[NL20-NL50] NL100 FR KK in CO

    • BadeaCelRau
      BadeaCelRau
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.10.2010 Posts: 2,122
      $0.50/$1 No Limit Holdem
      9 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      Stacks:
      UTG ($100) 100bb
      UTG+1 ($153.80) 154bb
      MP1 ($229.20) 229bb
      MP2 ($105) 105bb
      MP3 ($300.93) 301bb
      Hero (CO) ($146) 146bb
      BTN ($121.71) 122bb
      SB ($153.58) 154bb
      BB ($100) 100bb

      Pre-Flop: ($1.50, 9 players) Hero is CO K:heart: K:diamond:
      2 folds, MP1 raises to $2, MP2 calls $2, 1 fold, Hero raises to $9.50, 3 folds, MP1 calls $7.50, MP2 calls $7.50

      Flop: Q:spade: 10:spade: 2:diamond: ($30, 3 players)
      MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero bets $22.50, MP1 calls $22.50, MP2 calls $22.50

      Turn: 2:heart: ($97.50, 3 players)
      MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero goes all-in $114, MP1 folds, MP2 goes all-in $73

      River: 3:heart: ($243.50, 2 players, 2 all-in)

      Final Pot: $243.50

      MP1 super fish

      MP2 terribad reg
      His stats in 12k hands
      17/11/3.1/49/28/79
      76/51/25/55/2.6

      I think it's standard shove on the turn. He can't have QQ, he can't have TT because he would 3bet them. I put him exactly on flushdraw but he had A :spade: 2 :spade: :-|. Any mistakes? Would you do anything differently?
  • 6 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello BadeaCelRau,

      Why would you ever think they would 3bet with TT/QQ there? Especially such a reg with his W$SD I would assume he rarely does that. Rather just set-mines against you. So disagree on that, rather say that MP2 range is towards PPs mainly and of course some FD type of hands.

      If we Bet the flop then it means we are betting it for value and also the same applies on the turn. Don't really see myself Checking the turn whilst both could have draws in their ranges and even worse. But of course I doubt that we are getting called from a lot worse from such a MP2.

      Best Regards.
    • BadeaCelRau
      BadeaCelRau
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.10.2010 Posts: 2,122
      He would 3bet against the fish who min-raised. But he didn't so he can't have QQ or TT in his range.
    • Farmarchist
      Farmarchist
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.12.2010 Posts: 14,640
      I think because he's passive he has TT in his range. QQ is 100% a 3B.

      But after he calls the flop I don't think he has TT in has range. He would ship...

      So he has draws or AQ/QK/QJs. I think he folds +- his whole range OTT if we bet and thus the turnbet is fine. We still get value from worse hands (fish).

      ow what did he have? AQ? really?
    • BadeaCelRau
      BadeaCelRau
      Bronze
      Joined: 15.10.2010 Posts: 2,122
      No, I said A :spade: 2 :spade: in the OP :D . Horrible :(
    • Farmarchist
      Farmarchist
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.12.2010 Posts: 14,640
      wow sick I thought you had QK !! Veriz would you play the same with QK because I would (check my previous comment).

      Nh sir!
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      He would 3bet against the fish who min-raised. But he didn't so he can't have QQ or TT in his range.

      Yeah, true. Not used to evaluate NL100 hands, cause NL50 = 4bb raise. :D

      With KQ I would most likely skip the thin value and reevaluate the river, we wont see many worse hands paying us anyways and nor they ain't betting the river.