This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL5: KK with xxKAs board

    • Kony76
      Joined: 29.10.2010 Posts: 4,347
      Poker Stars, $0.02/$0.05 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 9 Players

      BB: $2.53 (50.6 bb)
      UTG+1: $1.86 (37.2 bb)
      UTG+2: $1.90 (38 bb)
      MP1: $3.70 (74 bb)
      MP2: $2.05 (41 bb)
      MP3: $5 (100 bb)
      CO: $5 (100 bb)
      Hero (BTN): $8.61 (172.2 bb)
      SB: $2.18 (43.6 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is BTN with K K
      6 folds, Hero raises to $0.15, SB folds, BB calls $0.10

      Flop: ($0.32) 7 4 K (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $0.20, BB calls $0.20

      Turn: ($0.72) A (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $0.55, BB folds

      I think this was a standard one, but, as the A is a scary card, if the opponent does not have one, he will fold the turn.
      Could I risk to loose one street of value and slowplay the turn, to try to get some bluffbet on the river?

      The villian is a 26/19/2.0 (VPIP/PFR/AF)
  • 3 replies
    • Balltas
      Joined: 13.01.2011 Posts: 103
      I think yes. :) there are very few hands that could possibly beat yours on the river. :) I woul imitate that I am playing with something like KQ and this A is scary for me too :)
    • CPallo
      Joined: 12.04.2012 Posts: 4,350
      Betting there isn't wrong, because if he has something there, you guys could play for stacks. Checking back isn't bad either, because it could temptate your opponent to bluff the river. Besides, there's only few draws and backdoor flush draw rarely hits your opponent's range, so I guess you'd get max-value by checking back.
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello Kony76,

      Both options are fine, neither of them is wrong. If you assume he is capable of bluffing then can also Check it behind.

      Best Regards.