[NL2-NL10] NL10: TT vs check behind

    • Avatars91
      Avatars91
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.12.2009 Posts: 2,689
      Poker Stars $10.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players - View hand 1875475
      DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

      BTN: $6.53 - VPIP: 35, PFR: 24, 3B: 8, AF: 1,8, cBetFlop: 67(3), Hands: 34
      Hero (SB): $10.15 - VPIP: 22, PFR: 19, 3B: 5, AF: 4,6, Hands: 57711
      BB: $15.42 - VPIP: 18, PFR: 15, 3B: 8, AF: 0,0, Hands: 40
      UTG: $14.60 - VPIP: 14, PFR: 14, 3B: 0, AF: 8,0, Hands: 36
      MP: $10.18 - VPIP: 18, PFR: 17, 3B: 9, AF: 0,0, Hands: 66
      CO: $5.82 - VPIP: 48, PFR: 4, 3B: 5, AF: 0,8, Hands: 50

      Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is SB with T :spade: T :club:
      3 folds, BTN raises to $0.30, Hero calls $0.25, 1 fold

      Flop: ($0.70) 8 :diamond: J :spade: 8 :spade: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN checks

      Turn: ($0.70) 7 :heart: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.50, BTN calls $0.50

      River: ($1.70) 7 :club: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.90, BTN folds

      I think this should be fine. Tough to put villain on a range after his turn call though. Maybe spiked a pair with 7x or checked behind A high/99 for bluff induce, thus I still think I can bet on the river (although he could as well just be slowplaying).
      Check/calling would really not make all that much sense. I mean, what does villain check behind on the flop, call the turn and bet the river with that I beat? He is probably almost never bluffing there unless he plays his FDs this way or illogically suddenly bets his A high on the river and that I would doubt.
  • 6 replies