This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, A-hi vs passive OPP IP HU

    • dienaszaglis
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by

      UTG ($3.60) 90bb
      UTG+1 ($6.70) 168bb
      CO ($4) 100bb
      HERO (BTN) ($4) 100bb
      SB ($4.87) 122bb
      BB ($13.83) 346bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 6 players) HERO is BTN 4:diamond: A:spade:
      3 folds, HERO raises to $0.12, 1 fold, BB calls $0.08

      Flop: K:spade: 6:diamond: 3:club: ($0.26, 2 players)
      BB checks, HERO bets $0.14, BB calls $0.14

      Turn: 6:heart: ($0.54, 2 players)
      BB checks, HERO checks

      River: Q:club: ($0.54, 2 players)
      BB checks, HERO checks

      Final Pot: $0.54
      BB shows
      5:diamond: 5:heart:
      HERO shows
      4:diamond: A:spade:

      BB wins $0.52 (net +$0.26)

      HERO lost $0.26

      29/10, FCB: 25, AF: 0.3, 48h

      *X/R w/ nuts?
      *ck/calls 1/2-2/3 flop/turn w/ 2nd pair
      *OL 89s @ BU, cks TQ8r, bets FD turn, cks missed river
      *calls AQs vs CO OR @ BB, ck/calls 2/3 935r, ck/calls 2/3 w/ FD turn, cks flush river

      I think villain`s calling with

      I think it`s better to check behind vs such a passive opponent. A-high still might be good. I can`t see him calling with worse.

      There`s no way I will bluff calling station. Reads suggest, that he`s calling with any pair, basically.

      Same as the turn.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello dienaszaglis,

      Seems to be fine as long he ain't even fold-happy. Nice hand! CBetting flop should be still fine whilst we gaining free card and some fold equity.

      Best Regards.