This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, MP/MK vs tight passive

    • dienaszaglis
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      4 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by

      CO ($4) 100bb
      HERO (BTN) ($4.06) 102bb
      SB ($1.88) 47bb
      BB ($4.18) 105bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 4 players) HERO is BTN 10:club: J:heart:
      1 fold, HERO raises to $0.12, SB calls $0.10, 1 fold

      Flop: 10:diamond: 6:spade: K:spade: ($0.28, 2 players)
      SB checks, HERO bets $0.13, SB calls $0.13

      Turn: 5:heart: ($0.54, 2 players)
      SB checks, HERO checks

      River: 4:diamond: ($0.54, 2 players)
      SB bets $0.28, HERO?

      10/2, FCB:0, AF:0.7, 41h

      I think, he`s calling pretty tight:

      Not sure, if he`s really calling with all of his range on the flop. If this stat is somewhat accurate, I have to bet and protect my hand. Bet-size should be around 0.18 - 0.2

      I think, it`s better to check, as he`s most likely never calling 2 streets with worse, only FD`s. My plan is go to showdown obviously.

      Question: is he bluffing enough to make this call? Bet-size looks more like a value-bet.
  • 2 replies
    • awishformore
      Joined: 16.06.2007 Posts: 922
      A lot of draws from the flop have missed, so for these odds, I would call and take a note.

      However, I would bet again on the turn. You avoid free cards for draws and at the same time, you avoid this kind of situation on the river.
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello dienaszaglis,

      Bet the flop bigger and not make look your hand weak as it it. Though otherwise rather 2nd barrel than turn your hand into bluff-catcher on the river.

      Best Regards.