This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, calling off with 99

    • dienaszaglis
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      4 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by

      CO ($4.10) 103bb
      BTN ($4) 100bb
      HERO (SB) ($5.67) 142bb
      BB ($4.38) 110bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 4 players) HERO is SB 9:heart: 9:diamond:
      CO raises to $0.12, 1 fold, HERO calls $0.10, 1 fold

      Flop: 4:spade: J:diamond: 8:club: ($0.28, 2 players)
      HERO checks, CO bets $0.16, HERO calls $0.16

      Turn: 10:spade: ($0.60, 2 players)
      HERO checks, CO bets $0.36, HERO calls $0.36

      River: 7:diamond: ($1.32, 2 players)
      HERO checks, CO bets $0.48, HERO raises to $1.52, CO calls $1.04

      Final Pot: $4.36
      HERO shows
      9:heart: 9:diamond:
      CO shows
      J:club: 10:club:

      19/13, ST@CO:25, CB:100, 66h

      Could 3bet for value. Calling is fine too.

      I think, X/R is better than calling, which is fine too.

      My plan is to c/c smaller bets in hopes to hit a straight.
      In this case my implied odds are great. I have about 20% pot equity and he offers me 28%.
      He`s probably got Jx.

      I check, because I think he`s still capable of barreling.
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343

      being on the SB I would prefer 3-betting rather than just calling. I would take c/c or lead on the flop. c/r would build you just big pot and you have no idea if you should barrel on the turn, also since there are no flushdraw he may easily 3-bet you back with air (since you´re not representing anything besides 88/44 that might easily just c/c flop).

      River I would lead myself 0.65$, since overpairs and top pair hands would check back too often- if you want to induce bluffs then c/r is also fine

      best regards,