[NL2-NL10] nl4 sh TT SB

    • noulispa
      noulispa
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.01.2010 Posts: 1,280
      MP: $4.84 (121 bb)
      CO: $4.24 (106 bb)
      BTN: $6.84 (171 bb)
      Hero (SB): $6.97 (174.3 bb)
      BB: $3.63 (90.8 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is SB with T:club: T:heart:
      2 folds, BTN calls $0.04, Hero raises to $0.20, BB folds, BTN calls $0.16

      Flop: ($0.44) 3:heart: 7:spade: 7:club: (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.33, BTN raises to $0.66, Hero calls $0.33

      Turn: ($1.76) K:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $0.99, Hero calls $0.99

      River: ($3.74) K:heart: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $4.99 and is all-in, Hero folds

      the opp looks fish 88/15 /27 hands on the flop i think that he is raising worst so i plan to call him at least on the turn ok plan ?
  • 6 replies
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello noulispa,

      Yes, seems to be fine as long he may also raise with air and draws or even weaker PPs.

      Best Regards.
    • dienaszaglis
      dienaszaglis
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      Let`s say villain`s AF is below 2. Without any reads folding the turn would be standard?
    • CPallo
      CPallo
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.04.2012 Posts: 4,343
      I guess against a passive fish calling the flop is questionable already, min-raise is most likely next to nuts. If he can bluff, then calling flop isn't that bad. On turn it's check/fold, passive opponent is not moving there with air or any worse (88 or 99 in best case, but not likely!)
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by dienaszaglis
      Let`s say villain`s AF is below 2. Without any reads folding the turn would be standard?
      For that given villain you can't really take into account AF cause clearly there is not enough of sample. But rather AFq and how we saw the villain. Though the K on the turn is perfect for him to barrel and use it as scare-card.
    • dienaszaglis
      dienaszaglis
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      OK, I will be rather specific: AF: 1.5, 100h, no reads.

      Can we ever assume, that such passive villain would 2-barrel 88, 99? I don`t think so. Also, there are no draws and likely he would not 2-barrel with air.

      As played: all depends on the reads - I could see myself folding the turn.
    • veriz
      veriz
      Black
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Originally posted by dienaszaglis
      OK, I will be rather specific: AF: 1.5, 100h, no reads.

      Can we ever assume, that such passive villain would 2-barrel 88, 99? I don`t think so. Also, there are no draws and likely he would not 2-barrel with air.

      As played: all depends on the reads - I could see myself folding the turn.
      AF for that sample is clearly overvalued, rather ignore it and what you should pay attention on is AFq. :) Folding on the turn is also fine if you assume he ain't bluffing but then why you calling the flop? ;) You beat practically the same range on the turn.