[NL2-NL10] calling down with K-high

    • Imimba1
      Imimba1
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.12.2011 Posts: 2,897
      Poker Stars $5.00 No Limit Hold'em - 6 players
      DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

      BTN: $5.00 - VPIP: 10, PFR: 5, 3B: 0, AF: 6,0, Hands: 94
      SB: $4.51 - VPIP: 57, PFR: 51, 3B: 28, AF: 12,0, Hands: 61 Openraise: 67%, Cbet: 87%, 2nd-3rdbarrel: 100% turn 4/4, river 2/2
      Hero (BB): $5.00 - VPIP: 21, PFR: 16, 3B: 4, AF: 2,0, Hands: 47092
      UTG: $6.32 - VPIP: 21, PFR: 13, 3B: 11, AF: 8,0, Hands: 53
      MP: $5.09 - VPIP: 52, PFR: 17, 3B: 0, AF: 5,0, Hands: 23
      CO: $5.00 - VPIP: 19, PFR: 16, 3B: 6, AF: 1,7, Hands: 360

      Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero is BB with Q :spade: K :club:
      4 folds, SB raises to $0.20, Hero calls $0.15

      Flop: ($0.40) 7 :club: 2 :heart: 8 :spade: (2 players)
      SB bets $0.40, Hero calls $0.40

      Turn: ($1.20) 4 :spade: (2 players)
      SB bets $1.15, Hero calls $1.15

      River: ($3.50) 4 :heart: (2 players)
      SB bets $2.76, Hero calls $2.76

      I think calling down is only profitable with at least A-high, even against a total maniac. Just check the equity difference, it's huge. I'm pretty sure that calling down with A-high wouldnt be a problem here. I stacked 2 maniacs recently with A-high calldowns, so I have some experience. :f_biggrin: The problem with K-high is that A-high beats it
      Equity Win Tie
      MP2 33.91% 33.05% 0.86% KQo
      MP3 66.09% 65.23% 0.86% 50% range

      MP2 54.79% 53.92% 0.88% AQo
      MP3 45.21% 44.33% 0.88% 50% range
  • 2 replies