This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] [SH] NL50 QQ vs 3bet

    • duder1n0
      Joined: 07.07.2009 Posts: 5,335
      Prima, $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players

      Hero (UTG): $56.31 (112.6 bb)
      MP: $50.89 (101.8 bb)
      CO: $67.51 (135 bb)
      BTN: $80.14 (160.3 bb)
      SB: $192.60 (385.2 bb)
      BB: $37.59 (75.2 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG with Q Q
      Hero raises to $1.50, MP folds, CO raises to $4.50, 3 folds, Hero calls $3

      Flop: ($9.75) 6 2 6 (2 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $4.75, Hero calls $4.75

      Turn: ($19.25) 2 (2 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $9.50, Hero calls $9.50

      River: ($38.25) 5 (2 players)
      Hero checks, CO checks

      Anon table.

      CO played 29/18 on small sample, no 3bet so far.

      Preflop 4bet/broke would definitely be an overplay. Calling is marginal, cause it could put me into tough spots postflop, but I felt that folding would maybe too weak.
      Turn? Plan was to ch/call turn, and probably ch/fold river if he barrels again. I dont know if he is able to barrel air three times on this board, but I cant really assume that.
  • 1 reply
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      Hello pcfmcc02,

      As long he is doing that against a UTG and we have 0 information about his 3bet I don't really like the Call preflop. Just most often going to be waste of money without any expectations.

      Postflop is standard if you expect to be ahead preflop, isn't it? At least that's the reason that you called preflop.

      Best Regards.