[NL2-NL10] 87s 4bet pot

    • zumpar
      zumpar
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.02.2012 Posts: 1,185
      villain was 3betting and squeezing a LOT, i decide to 4bet, he calls
      its pretty much always AK from what ive seen on iPoker so far - sometimes its QQ but thats it

      i checked behind flop, turn he checks, so its pretty much always AK i thought, QQ would bet, and river he bets 1/2 pot,
      just wondering if u think its +EV to call river

      Known Players:
      MP2: $0,92 - 18 bb
      MP3: $8,31 - 166 bb
      CO: $6,50 - 130 bb
      BU: $1,12 - 22 bb
      SB: $7,46 - 149 bb
      BB: $12,62 - 252 bb

      0,02/0,05 No Limit Hold'em (6 Handed)
      Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 1.0.51108.1

      Preflop: Hero is CO with 8:club: , 7:club:
      SB posts small blind ($0,02), BB posts big blind ($0,05), 2 folds, Hero raises for $0,15, BU calls, SB folds, BB 3-bets $0,57, Hero 4-bets $1,55, BU folds, BB calls

      Flop: ($3,57 - 71.40 bb) J:heart: , T:heart: , 7:spade: (2 Players)
      BB checks, Hero checks

      Turn: ($3,57 - 71.40 bb) 5:spade: (2 Players)
      BB checks, Hero checks

      River: ($3,57 - 71.40 bb) T:diamond: (2 Players)
      BB bets $1,78, Hero calls


      BB shows A:heart: K:spade:
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      First, I wouldn't 4-bet bluff a hand like ours. 4-bet bluffs need to work a lot (60%+) so we want to create spots where our fold equity is highest (and thus 4-bet bluffing hands with blockers).

      As played I would bet/fold that flop to protect against AK/AQ, take down the pot. Once he checks twice I'd definitely bet the turn.

      As played calling river is fine as he almost never has anything better than us (maybe a 99,88 sometimes but he most likely checks those down).