[NL2-NL10] NL10 9max: AA - flop raise?

    • Kruppe
      Joined: 20.02.2008 Posts: 2,145
      looking at this I think it's very unlikely he has a flushdraw, so no protection is needed. taking this into account, should i still raise like this?

      Full Tilt Poker, $0.05/$0.10 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 9 Players
      LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

      MP2: $1.90
      CO: $9.15
      BTN: $13.75
      SB: $5.35
      BB: $13.80
      UTG: $2.95
      UTG+1: $17.95
      Kruppe (UTG+2): $9.85
      MP1: $3.65

      Pre-Flop: A:spade: A:diamond: dealt to Kruppe (UTG+2)
      UTG folds, UTG+1 raises to $0.20, Kruppe raises to $0.80, 6 folds, UTG+1 calls $0.60

      Flop: ($1.75) 9:spade: 8:spade: K:diamond: (2 Players)
      UTG+1 bets $0.60, Kruppe raises to $2.80, UTG+1 folds
  • 3 replies
    • Petrificus
      Joined: 18.02.2008 Posts: 394
      nh, imo. Perhaps a little bit too much. What about ~2$?
    • burningzeus
      Joined: 06.06.2007 Posts: 480
      well a UTG hast a very predictable range

      he could have PP, but would have raised Kings. Ergo you don´t have to be afraid of a set
      he could have an Ace like AK, which would be best case szenario for hero

      I totally agree with you. There is almost no chance at all he has the draw, since you´re holding the Ace of Spade

      A-Pot size raise would be (3*0,60)+(1,75) = 3,55$
      So your Raise-Size is actually fine imo

      You shouldn´t bet less. You are not even betting the pot on a dangerous Board ... would you do this play without aces? I think this is on the verge of getting readable
    • Thorsten77
      Joined: 28.05.2006 Posts: 12,896
      I often call his donk in order to get another bet on the turn. If I raise, I'd raise less as I'm not very concerned about a flush draw.