Sizing for river bluff

    • getdotacom
      Joined: 06.04.2008 Posts: 608
      $2/$4 No Limit Holdem
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by

      UTG ($565) 141bb
      UTG+1 ($446) 112bb
      CO ($400) 100bb
      BTN ($413.94) 103bb
      HERO (SB) ($552.54) 138bb
      BB ($1,091.59) 273bb

      Pre-Flop: ($6, 6 players) HERO is SB 5:heart: 7:heart:
      1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $10, 1 fold, BTN calls $10, HERO calls $8, 1 fold

      Flop: 6:club: 10:diamond: 4:club: ($34, 3 players)
      HERO bets $24, UTG+1 folds, BTN calls $24

      Turn: 2:club: ($82, 2 players)
      HERO bets $64, BTN calls $64

      River: A:diamond: ($210, 2 players)
      HERO bets $152, BTN folds

      All players in hand regs. A guy who called - 25/17, WTSD21. What sizing u would use here ? I think 152 is too big, he will never call without a flush here anyways. Maybe he can fold bottom set or AT to 152, but I wanted to bluff him off only 1 pair hands.
  • 3 replies
    • mbml
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779
      preflop seems too loose in SB and vs 2 regs.
      flop: think i prefer c/r or c/c
      river: in BU he shouldn't have too many overpairs right? he should technically be losing to any sort of value range from you on the River even if you half pot. I'm just wondering whether he could turn anything into a bluff if u halfpot. Would you even do that with flushes or sets? 130? Doesn't look as weak as halfpotting and you can rep a wider value range of sets and flushes.
    • imfromsweden007
      Joined: 11.10.2008 Posts: 726
      I think betting 114 looks really strong
    • muumionu
      Joined: 25.07.2012 Posts: 816
      Originally posted by imfromsweden007
      I think betting 114 looks really strong
      113 better imo