This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] against almost unknown

    • daisuke3823
      daisuke3823
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.02.2008 Posts: 8,321
      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      ハンドをプレーする

      $0.25/$0.5 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)

      Known players:
      BU:
      $43.60
      SB (Hero):
      $35.78
      BB:
      $62.25
      MP2:
      $41.88
      MP3:
      $16.59
      CO:
      $55.40


      Preflop: Hero is SB with K, A.
      4 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, BB raises to $8.00, Hero folds, BB gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $1.5.

      he is unknown,just played 3 hands with him,but he limped from early position with KJ once.
      after this hand,we played 12 hands and his stats became like this
      vpip36 pfr9 af4 wtsd33 w$SD100 3BET14、3
      if I had this stats when I played this hand,I could go 4 bet all in,but just played 3 hands,could I go all in? cuz of his limp and raise size was strange?
  • 4 replies
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779
      Hi,

      I think folding is fine. His 3bet looks super huge and you are deep. Given our assumptions that he is passive, I just think his range is super strong here.
      With more info later on (36/9), i actually think it is even more likely that he is strong. I am fairly certain that your 3bet stat is incorrect, you just have a really low sample. It doesn't make sense for his 3bet to be higher than his PFR.
    • TetraQuark
      TetraQuark
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.05.2008 Posts: 1,521
      Hero is not fully stacked(nl50 35$). This is mandatory stackoff pre vs unknown.
    • daisuke3823
      daisuke3823
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.02.2008 Posts: 8,321
      Originally posted by mbml
      Hi,

      I think folding is fine. His 3bet looks super huge and you are deep. Given our assumptions that he is passive, I just think his range is super strong here.
      With more info later on (36/9), i actually think it is even more likely that he is strong. I am fairly certain that your 3bet stat is incorrect, you just have a really low sample. It doesn't make sense for his 3bet to be higher than his PFR.
      hmm looked it again and its 3BET14、3.
      is it strange?
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779
      oh i thought NL25. hmmm this should be a stack-off then. Not too happy about it cos he has shown some passive tendencies. It's still a rather close decision I think.