[NL2-NL10] nl2 fr set on flop

    • johny8984
      johny8984
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.08.2009 Posts: 62
      PokerStars - $0.02 NL (9 max) ZOOM - Holdem - 9 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      BTN: $2.31
      SB: $1.17
      BB: $2.13
      UTG: $1.44
      UTG+1: $11.97
      Hero (MP): $3.15
      MP+1: $1.60
      LP: $3.27
      CO: $1.35

      SB posts SB $0.01, BB posts BB $0.02

      Pre Flop: ($0.03) Hero has 3:diamond: 3:spade:

      UTG raises to $0.06, fold, Hero calls $0.06, fold, fold, fold, BTN calls $0.06, SB calls $0.05, fold

      Flop: ($0.26, 4 players) 3:heart: J:heart: 7:heart:
      SB bets $0.18, UTG calls $0.18, Hero raises to $3.09 and is all-in, fold, fold, UTG calls $1.20 and is all-in

      Turn: ($3.20, 2 players) K:heart:

      River: ($3.20, 2 players) 9:spade:

      UTG shows A:heart: 8:heart: (Flush, Ace High) (Pre 50%, Flop 66%, Turn 77%)
      Hero shows 3:diamond: 3:spade: (Three of a Kind, Threes) (Pre 50%, Flop 34%, Turn 23%)
      UTG wins $3.09


      should i shove here expecting a call from a flush draw and have the full house draw as plan B
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,694
      Hi.

      I don't like your shove. It just looks super strong. Hands like AK will just fold.

      To raise here, you must know that people just stack off one pair hands here. Vs tight players, they only call with higher sets and flushes. So your play would be very bad and I would prefer to call and hope for pairing boards before raising. IF not you always have the option of just pot controlling and calling down (you only put in half your stack) and you can still be beating a huge part of your opponent's range.

      So if you want to raise, make a smaller raise. But I don't really like playing 33 like that, it just feels like an overplay. If you had top set, perhaps a raise is better since you dominate lower sets.