[NL2-NL10] NL10 SH JJ trouble spot

    • lood88
      lood88
      Bronze
      Joined: 26.09.2010 Posts: 88
      $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
      PartyPoker
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      Stacks:
      UTG ($10) 100bb 33/29/14,3/3,0/89
      Hero (UTG+1) ($10.19) 102bb
      CO ($10.10) 101bb 13/12/5,2/4,5/449 9,4 squeeze
      BTN ($11.33) 113bb
      SB ($13.07) 131bb tuna
      BB ($6.55) 66bb fish

      Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) Hero is UTG+1 J:diamond: J:spade:
      UTG raises to $0.35, Hero calls $0.35, CO raises to $1.40, 3 folds, UTG folds, Hero calls $1.05

      Flop: 8:heart: 2:heart: 7:club: ($3.30, 2 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $2.09, Hero calls $2.09

      Turn: 2:diamond: ($7.48, 2 players)
      Hero goes all-in $6.70, CO goes all-in $6.61

      Preflop: Just called to get fishes in. For some reason I didn't think about nit behind me. What can I do after this squeeze?

      Flop: His sizing seems big. Wasn't really comfortable calling and shove seems like overplay.

      Turn: I think this was mistake, turning hand into bluff. I don't really represent enough hands here for him to fold overpairs.

      Suggestions?
  • 2 replies
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Lood,

      Preflop: Calling to keep the fish in is fine as 3-betting here would turn our hand into a small bluff.

      Once the nit squeezes I would just muck my hand. Why should we call a 3-bet from a nit?

      As played we are usually winning small/medium pots and gifting a lot of small, medium and big pots to villain.
    • lood88
      lood88
      Bronze
      Joined: 26.09.2010 Posts: 88
      Originally posted by BogdanPS
      Once the nit squeezes I would just muck my hand. Why should we call a 3-bet from a nit?
      Yea, good point. Seemed too weak tho...