This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50 AA blind battle

    • double2
      Joined: 04.11.2008 Posts: 14,642
      Hand converted with online hand converter:

      Reproduzir mão

      $0.25/$0.5 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)

      Known players:
      SB (Hero):

      Preflop: Hero is SB with A, A.
      3 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, BB calls $1.00.

      Flop: ($3) 3, J, 8 (2 players)
      Hero bets $2.00, BB raises to $5.50, Hero calls $3.50.

      Turn: ($14) 9 (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB bets $7.50, Hero calls $7.50.

      River: ($29) J (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB bets $19.50, Hero folds, BB gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $29.

      Villain 721 hands
      call vs steal BB 27% (49)
      fold to cbet flop 55% (20)
      raise cbet 1 in 19
      WTSD 28%
      WWSF 41%
      Agg freq 38/24/17

      I hate these spot where villain doesn't represent anything flop but he is actually quite passive post flop... The plan turn was to call rivers non Q, T, 7 or J.
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Double2,

      If villains are really passive that implies that they won't often bluff. Because of that I won't often bluffcatch versus them. It's true that he doesn't rep much but he can still have 33, JJ, 88, J8 (sure he can slowplay sometimes).

      As played, how many streets to expect a passive guy to bluff, especially on a blank more or less?

      I'd say that when he bets the turn he doesn't have a bluff.