This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Rush NL10 KK in UTG+1

    • BigAl123456
      BigAl123456
      Bronze
      Joined: 21.07.2010 Posts: 4,080
      Full Tilt, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, Rush, 9 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      BB: $9 (90 bb)
      Hero (UTG+1): $10 (100 bb)
      UTG+2: $8.92 (89.2 bb)
      MP1: $4.16 (41.6 bb)
      MP2: $4.42 (44.2 bb)
      MP3: $9.71 (97.1 bb)
      CO: $11.25 (112.5 bb)
      BTN: $13.57 (135.7 bb)
      SB: $9.29 (92.9 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with K K
      Hero raises to $0.40, 3 folds, MP3 calls $0.40, 4 folds

      Flop: ($0.95) 6 4 Q (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.70, MP3 calls $0.70

      Turn: ($2.35) 8 (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.65, MP3 calls $1.65

      River: ($5.65) T (2 players)
      Hero bets $3, MP3 raises to $6.96 and is all-in, Hero calls $3.96

      Results:
      $19.57 pot ($1.30 rake)
      Final Board: 6 4 Q 8 T
      Hero mucked K K and lost (-$9.71 net)
      MP3 showed A J and won $18.27 ($8.56 net)


      MP3 is Lose Pasive over 60 hands, I think this is a case of me not paying enough attention to stack sizes on the River with any bet I make comitting me so I guess if I bet I should bet bigger?
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi BigAl,

      Preflop: looks good,

      Flop: Looks good, could bet bigger

      Turn: looks fine, I'd bet slightly smaller

      River: I wouldn't bet/stack off here even though it seems we are committed. Since he is passive what worse shoves there?