This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] KK on AAx

    • AchillesBG
      Joined: 06.02.2011 Posts: 4,586
      Prima, $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      BTN: $15.75 (31.5 bb)
      SB: $187.19 (374.4 bb)
      BB: $55.87 (111.7 bb)
      Hero (UTG): $82.31 (164.6 bb)
      MP: $73.20 (146.4 bb)
      CO: $62.58 (125.2 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG with K:spade: K:heart:
      Hero raises to $1.50, 3 folds, SB calls $1.25, BB folds

      Flop: ($3.50) A:club: A:heart: 3:heart: (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $1.75, SB raises to $5.25, Hero folds

      Results: $7 pot ($0.35 rake)
      Final Board: A:club: A:heart: 3:heart:
      SB mucked and won $6.65 ($3.40 net)
      Hero mucked K:spade: K:heart: and lost (-$3.25 net)

      Anon. table
      20/11, 31% agg. freq., 60% fold to Cbet(6), 107 hands

      I think Cbet i better than check behind? I want to bet this flop 100% and ch/b will be unbalanced? I also might get called by FD and lower PP?
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Achilles,

      You are worried about balancing at anonymous tables when facing a weak fishy regular (20/11)? Why exactly?

      If your argument is that you want to bet for value (thin value) then I agree with you. There are some draws and worse PPs that can call however value is thin and we have a better chance of getting called down on 1-2 streets if we check back.