[NL20-NL50] KK on AAx

    • AchillesBG
      AchillesBG
      Gold
      Joined: 06.02.2011 Posts: 4,562
      Prima, $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      BTN: $15.75 (31.5 bb)
      SB: $187.19 (374.4 bb)
      BB: $55.87 (111.7 bb)
      Hero (UTG): $82.31 (164.6 bb)
      MP: $73.20 (146.4 bb)
      CO: $62.58 (125.2 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG with K:spade: K:heart:
      Hero raises to $1.50, 3 folds, SB calls $1.25, BB folds

      Flop: ($3.50) A:club: A:heart: 3:heart: (2 players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $1.75, SB raises to $5.25, Hero folds

      Results: $7 pot ($0.35 rake)
      Final Board: A:club: A:heart: 3:heart:
      SB mucked and won $6.65 ($3.40 net)
      Hero mucked K:spade: K:heart: and lost (-$3.25 net)

      Anon. table
      20/11, 31% agg. freq., 60% fold to Cbet(6), 107 hands

      I think Cbet i better than check behind? I want to bet this flop 100% and ch/b will be unbalanced? I also might get called by FD and lower PP?
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Achilles,

      You are worried about balancing at anonymous tables when facing a weak fishy regular (20/11)? Why exactly?

      If your argument is that you want to bet for value (thin value) then I agree with you. There are some draws and worse PPs that can call however value is thin and we have a better chance of getting called down on 1-2 streets if we check back.