Originally posted by shloogy
this goes like this :
FRP u get 27% rakeback which is AMAZING.
but on NL10the rake is 10% instead of regular 5%.
now PS do not offer rakeback but they offer VIP status, as u advance your status u will earn more FPP's which be equivalent up to I-don't-know-how-but-very-high rake back which u can buy bonuses, enter tourneys and such.
plus, FTP is full of TAG's which will make is so much harder to make money.
but, they do offer a 600 frist time deposit bonus.
to sum it, poker stars is much better in terms of playability - lots of donks.lots.
FTP - if u will be really good maybe u can realease the bonus and even make some cash in rakeback.
firstly the average rakeback is 30%, full tilt is great with the rakeback aslong as your not a cash player(low stakes anyway)
PS does offer rakeback through a site(can't remember what it was called lol)something like 5-6% upto 36% depending on the VIP status
and FT the play is much better but with the bonus+rakeback it balances out plus it makes you a better player ^^ and the main thing for me is that FT is so much easier for HU players like me PS riduclous 10% rake on HU where as FT offer 5% HU games + rakeback
i would recommend anyone with the intial $50 to put it onto PS,unless your a HU then put it into full tilt but overwise leave it on PS extract all the free cash then move over to FT
just my $0.02
