[NL2-NL10] NL2 zoom - lost on turn

    • redrawstump
      Joined: 09.05.2012 Posts: 244
      I got really lost on the turn with this hand. I called for set-mining purposes but with 7s as overpair on the flop and his small bet I thought I was raising for value. I wasn't sure if betting made any sense on turn so went for chk/fold. Is this too weak? Should I have even raised flop initially to get to this point? Again, as with other hands I've posted today it's a zoom table so villain unknown.

      Thanks for you time + consideration :D

      Known Players:
      UTG2: $0.46 - 23 bb
      UTG3: $2.43 - 122 bb
      MP1: $3.46 - 173 bb
      MP2: $1.24 - 62 bb
      MP3: $5.93 - 297 bb
      CO: $0.98 - 49 bb
      BU: $1.32 - 66 bb
      SB: $2.02 - 101 bb
      BB: $2.00 - 100 bb

      0.01/0.02 No Limit Hold'em (9 Handed)
      Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 1.0.51227.1

      Preflop: Hero is SB with 7:heart: , 7:spade:
      Hero posts small blind ($0.01), BB posts big blind ($0.02), UTG2 folds, UTG3 raises for $0.08, 5 folds, Hero calls, BB folds

      Flop: ($0.18 - 9 bb) 5:club: , 3:heart: , 3:diamond: (2 Players)
      Hero checks, UTG3 bets $0.08, Hero raises for $0.24, UTG3 calls

      Turn: ($0.66 - 33 bb) 9:diamond: (2 Players)
      Hero checks, UTG3 bets $0.32, Hero folds, UTG3 gets uncalled back ($0.32)
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Red,

      As played what do we raise for value against?

      Do you expect villain to just call AK/AQ/AJ type hands or possibly 22/44/66? Are you going broke vs a 3-bet?

      Being in UTG (+1) his range is on the stronger side and he will have quite a few overpairs that won't just fold here.

      So to me your bet looks like a bluff that is trying to get him to fold his equity in the hand.