This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl2 Qq

    • BeatYouTwice
      BeatYouTwice
      Bronze
      Joined: 03.02.2012 Posts: 28
      Known Players:
      MP2: $2,65 - 133 bb
      MP3: $1,97 - 99 bb
      CO: $4,26 - 213 bb
      BU: $2,34 - 117 bb
      SB: $1,09 - 55 bb
      BB: $0,88 - 44 bb

      0,01/0,02 No Limit Hold'em (6 Handed)
      Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 1.1.109.1

      Preflop: Hero is BU with Q:heart: , Q:diamond:
      SB posts small blind ($0,01), BB posts big blind ($0,02), MP2 calls, 2 folds, Hero raises for $0,08, SB calls, 2 folds

      Flop: ($0,20 - 10 bb) A:spade: , 9:heart: , 4:spade: (2 Players)
      SB checks, Hero bets $0,10, SB calls

      Turn: ($0,40 - 20 bb) 7:diamond: (2 Players)
      SB checks, Hero checks

      River: ($0,40 - 20 bb) 8:club: (2 Players)
      SB bets $0,20, Hero folds, SB gets uncalled back ($0,20)



      Too tight of a fold?
  • 2 replies
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi,

      Do we have any info on villain? He looks fishy due to stack size.

      If he is a fishy guy we can cbet 1/2 pot on turn for thin value vs draws/2nd pair and then check the river back.

      As played we get 25% pot odds on the river and we are giving villain a chance to bluff because we checked the turn back. By default I would look at bluff catching here but it does come down to what type of villain we have. If he is a passive fishy guy we can fold and it wouldn't be too tight.
    • BeatYouTwice
      BeatYouTwice
      Bronze
      Joined: 03.02.2012 Posts: 28
      I made the decision based on like 3-4 times I saw him play top pairs this way.