[NL2-NL10] Threes and Fours would still be beat...

    • generals007
      Joined: 17.09.2007 Posts: 578
      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)     
      vp$ip	foldbb	ats	pfr
      af	w$sd	wts	hands
      MP1 (4,01)
      MP2 (4,40)
      BB (5,02)

      0,02/0,04 No-Limit Hold'em [color:blue](8 handed)[/color]
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 8:club: , 7:heart:
      [color:grey]UTG+2 folds[/color], MP1 calls $0,04, MP2 calls $0,04, [color:grey]4 folds[/color], Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0,14) 9:diamond: , 4:club: , 9:heart: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks.

      Turn: ($0,14) 3:diamond: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks.

      River: ($0,14) 8:spade: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      [color:red]Hero bets $0,08[/color], [color:grey]MP1 folds[/color], [color:red]MP2 raises to $0,16[/color], Hero calls $0,08.

      Final Pot: $0,46

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      [color:white]MP2 shows [ Ac, 9s ] three of a kind, Nines[/color]
      [color:white]Hero shows [ 8c, 7h ] two pairs, Nines and Eights[/color]
      [color:white]MP2 wins $0.44 USD with three of a kind, Nines.[/color]


      On the river i thought that i might lose value if i don't bet... there are still the threes and fours that i can beat with my eight. But my kicker sucks, so it was probably wrong...

  • 1 reply