This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Threes and Fours would still be beat...

    • generals007
      Joined: 17.09.2007 Posts: 578
      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)     
      vp$ip	foldbb	ats	pfr
      af	w$sd	wts	hands
      MP1 (4,01)
      MP2 (4,40)
      BB (5,02)

      0,02/0,04 No-Limit Hold'em [color:blue](8 handed)[/color]
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 8:club: , 7:heart:
      [color:grey]UTG+2 folds[/color], MP1 calls $0,04, MP2 calls $0,04, [color:grey]4 folds[/color], Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0,14) 9:diamond: , 4:club: , 9:heart: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks.

      Turn: ($0,14) 3:diamond: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks.

      River: ($0,14) 8:spade: [color:blue](3 players)[/color]
      [color:red]Hero bets $0,08[/color], [color:grey]MP1 folds[/color], [color:red]MP2 raises to $0,16[/color], Hero calls $0,08.

      Final Pot: $0,46

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      [color:white]MP2 shows [ Ac, 9s ] three of a kind, Nines[/color]
      [color:white]Hero shows [ 8c, 7h ] two pairs, Nines and Eights[/color]
      [color:white]MP2 wins $0.44 USD with three of a kind, Nines.[/color]


      On the river i thought that i might lose value if i don't bet... there are still the threes and fours that i can beat with my eight. But my kicker sucks, so it was probably wrong...

  • 1 reply