[NL2-NL10] NL4 SH, over-pair against passive fish

    • dienaszaglis
      dienaszaglis
      Bronze
      Joined: 12.06.2008 Posts: 999
      $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Holdem
      PartyPoker
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      Stacks:
      UTG ($1.83) 46bb
      UTG+1 ($4) 100bb
      HERO (CO) ($5.94) 149bb
      BTN ($5.85) 146bb
      SB ($4.84) 121bb
      BB ($2.50) 63bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.06, 6 players) HERO is CO A:diamond: A:heart:
      2 folds, HERO raises to $0.12, BTN calls $0.12, 1 fold, BB calls $0.08

      Flop: Q:heart: J:heart: 6:diamond: ($0.38, 3 players)
      BB bets $0.18, HERO raises to $0.56, BTN folds, BB goes all-in $2.20, HERO?

      BB: 20/1, AF: 1.1 (9%), 3B:0 180h

      PRE
      Standard.

      FLOP
      I was kinda tired when I played this hand and did not really notice villains extremely low AF. As played, my plan was to raise him and call AI.

      He`s probably got QQ/JJ/QJ.
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,694
      Hi,

      Maybe we can discount QQ and JJ to some extent as those hands would squeeze preflop. But then again, he is 20/1 and perhaps he just slowplays all those hands preflop. Thus, I think it's reasonable for him to have QJ and all sets.

      Flop raise here could be reasonable, though we should have more or less already planned on what to do vs a flop 3bet. Stack off? or just fold? I think if we don't have a good idea about that, we should just keep calling. We block nut flush draws/combo draws with our Ace of heart. Coupled with his low AF, that makes me more inclined to just call and keep calling, or bet when checked to.

      Thanks.