This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50 SH - KQs: vs squeezer

    • Lunitis
      Lunitis
      Bronze
      Joined: 22.02.2009 Posts: 20,136
      24/21
      11% squeeze
      8% 3bet vs utg (8.1 oop)
      39% fold vs 4bet (49)
      77% cbet flop 3bet pot
      33% fold vs raise (9)
      32% cbet turn 3b
      7.3k hands

      BU reg
      68% fold vs 3bet

      hero folds 61% vs 3bet (46% utg)



      MP: $132.69 (265.4 bb)
      CO: $31.93 (63.9 bb)
      BTN: $53.60 (107.2 bb)
      SB: $19.25 (38.5 bb)
      BB: $56.35 (112.7 bb)
      Hero (UTG): $50.75 (101.5 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is UTG with Q:spade: K:spade:
      Hero raises to $1.50, 2 folds, BTN calls $1.50, SB folds, BB raises to $6, Hero ?
  • 1 reply
    • EmanuelC16
      EmanuelC16
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.01.2010 Posts: 13,909
      Hi,

      I usually dislike calling here because of bad position. You always have to worry about BU and can't do much postflop unless you hit a decent piece.

      If BU 3bets vs UTG (therefore doesn't have QQ+, AK in his flatting range here) I would 4bet/fold. Being suited you can argue for a call vs 8% 3bet but I think he is a bit tighter than usual when squeezing this specific spot and your playaibility is still not high enough, while 4betting KQ should show a profit in these positions.