This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL25sh QQ oop, board Kxxxx, line b, x/c, x/c

    • member001
      member001
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.03.2010 Posts: 288
      Full Tilt, $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em Cash, Rush, 6 Players

      BB: $68.66 (274.6 bb)
      UTG: $31.80 (127.2 bb)
      MP: $25.25 (101 bb)
      Hero (CO): $29.03 (116.1 bb)
      BTN: $17.99 (72 bb) unknown but fishy stack size
      SB: $25 (100 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is CO with Q Q
      2 folds, Hero raises to $0.60, BTN calls $0.60, 2 folds

      Flop: ($1.55) K 2 9 (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.80, BTN calls $0.80

      Turn: ($3.15) 7 (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $1.25, Hero calls $1.25

      River: ($5.65) 4 (2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $2.75, Hero calls $2.75

      Results:
      $11.15 pot ($0.55 rake)
      Final Board: K 2 9 7 4
      Hero showed Q Q and won $10.60 ($5.20 net)
      BTN showed Q A and lost (-$5.40 net)


      Pre: maybe open for the full 3bb because possible fish behind?

      Flop: annoying K but I expect his range to be mostly Ax and PPs so I think I can vbet. I make it on the small side to encourage PPs to call.

      Turn, river: not thrilled to x/c two more streets but playing showdown value / bluffcatch, especially considering his sizing. Is this doable against unknown? What if he bets bigger? Also our ranges are weaker CU vs BU, but I would be less happy to do this in earlier positions, correct?
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779
      Hi.

      Vs fishy players i still prefer a flop check. We cannot valuebet more than two streets and a flop check underrepresents our hand the most to a non thinking player.

      Betting flop may be better for merge and disguise purposes vs good regs.

      Thanks.