[NL2-NL10] AQo sh SB face min 4bet

    • noulispa
      noulispa
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.01.2010 Posts: 1,280
      BB: $5.21 (104.2 bb) 84/41/3bet 33/cbet 45-60/post flop agg 19 /WTSD 41/107 hands
      MP: $5.16 (103.2 bb)
      CO: $2.64 (52.8 bb)
      BTN: $5.49 (109.8 bb)
      Hero (SB): $5.29 (105.8 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is SB with A:club: Q:spade:
      MP calls $0.05, CO folds, BTN raises to $0.22, Hero raises to $0.70, BB raises to $1.18, 2 folds, Hero calls $0.48

      Flop: ($2.63) J:spade: 4:spade: 2:club: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB checks

      Turn: ($2.63) 9:heart: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB checks

      River: ($2.63) 5:diamond: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BB bets $1.52, Hero folds


      the opp is a fish i could have gone broke preflop ? I call his min 4bet to hit A or Q and go broke on the flop ok plan ?
  • 3 replies
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Noulispa,

      Preflop: He does seem very active preflop with a 3-bet that's pretty big over 107 hands. That implies that he is most likely capable for 4-betting as well.

      So why would we 3-bet him if we didn't have a plan for a 4-bet?

      So we could look at stacking off there. I think calling is so/so because we don't really hit with AQo and we are investing 25% of our stack.
    • noulispa
      noulispa
      Bronze
      Joined: 27.01.2010 Posts: 1,280
      I think calling is so/so


      so/so =?? i dont get this.


      yes i agree i should have gone broke pre.
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Originally posted by noulispa
      I think calling is so/so


      so/so =?? i dont get this.


      yes i agree i should have gone broke pre.
      What I meant is that it looks that we get the odds but we rarely flop anything and we can rarely continue otherwise.