This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] NL50 SH - QTs: tp vs nit

    • Lunitis
      Lunitis
      Bronze
      Joined: 22.02.2009 Posts: 20,136
      MP: 47/16

      BU: 17/12
      2.3 af
      72% fold vs cbet flop
      0% fold vs cbet turn (2)
      757 hands


      BB: $33.26 (66.5 bb)
      UTG: $104.58 (209.2 bb)
      MP: $41.03 (82.1 bb)
      Hero (CO): $62.69 (125.4 bb)
      BTN: $19.25 (38.5 bb)
      SB: $32.65 (65.3 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is CO with T:spade: Q:spade:
      UTG folds, MP calls $0.50, Hero raises to $2, BTN calls $2, 3 folds

      Flop: ($5.25) 6:club: Q:heart: 2:heart: (2 players)
      Hero bets $3.50, BTN calls $3.50

      Turn: ($12.25) 2:spade: (2 players)
      Hero ?
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      mbml
      Black
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779
      Hi,

      I would bet half pot vs such a shallow stack. We also want to risk less with our cbet bluffs. Betting large just encourages him to fold hands worse than QX.

      Turn is a clear check. His preflop range is so tight, and his fold vs cbet flop is so low. I think he almost always have QX here at the very least, and vs a very tight range of stronger QX and flush draws, I don't think we can have a profitable c/c here. So I just check/fold/

      So this boils down to whether we even have a profitable cbet in the first place. Cbet bluffing is definitely very +EV vs this guy. But if he just folds so often then maybe we shouldn't cbet this weak QX hand on the Flop for value.

      Thanks.