[NL2-NL10] nl sh ATo 3bet BU

    • noulispa
      Joined: 27.01.2010 Posts: 1,280
      Hero (BTN): $2.04 (102 bb)
      SB: $2 (100 bb)
      BB: $0.41 (20.5 bb)
      UTG: $4.65 (232.5 bb) 32/9/WTSD 36/110 hands marked as fish
      MP: $2.41 (120.5 bb)
      CO: $2.03 (101.5 bb) 20/16/pfr CO 25(59)/fld 3bet 43/fld cbet 11-55-0/PF agg 33-20-26/301 hands

      Preflop: Hero is BTN with T:club: A:diamond:
      UTG calls $0.02, MP folds, CO raises to $0.08, Hero raises to $0.24, 3 folds, CO calls $0.16

      Flop: ($0.53) 9:club: A:club: 9:spade: (2 players)
      CO checks, Hero checks

      Turn: ($0.53) 3:club: (2 players)
      CO bets $0.36, Hero calls $0.36

      River: ($1.25) 7:spade: (2 players)
      CO bets $1.43 and is all-in, Hero folds

      preflop : the CO probably Isolate the weak limper + he is not folding to 3bets . So i 3bet for value with ATo . When i get called i put him on pairs some broadways and some big Ax.

      on the flop : after he checks i think its better to check back cause i consider my AT as a weak ace so i like to pot control + i cant get 3 streets of value from a worst hand like 88-jj and there arent a lot weak A that call 3 streets so i check back

      turn : he donks and i am calling with top pair + FD he is maybe bet here his whole range weaker pairs and stuff.

      river : his push looks strong i expect to check back all his weaker pairs even the Ax . On the river i plan to fold to a big bet like bigger that 1/2 pot .

      What u think ?
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,698

      Preflop: I doubt the CO isoraises here wider than he opens. Thus I think ATo is definitely not a value 3bet. I would regard it as a bluff. I think the 3bet size could be smaller (20 cents)

      As played, I am just calling down if he is capable of being aggro. Is he though? He seems to be on the passive side, and the flush gets there. I don't mind folding too much.