[NL20-NL50] NL25 FR 66 (set)

    • hungary
      Joined: 10.03.2007 Posts: 1,414
      $0.1/$0.25 No Limit Holdem
      9 players
      Converted at weaktight.com

      UTG ($28.75)
      UTG+1 ($19.10)
      MP1 ($28.90)
      Hero ($25.00)
      MP3 ($5.00)
      CO ($24.50)
      BTN ($9.55)
      SB ($11.05)
      BB ($4.65)

      Pre-flop: ($0.35, 9 players) Hero is MP2 6:club: 6:heart:
      1 fold, UTG+1 calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero calls $0.25, 2 folds, BTN calls $0.25, SB calls $0.15, BB checks

      Flop: 3:heart: 9:diamond: 6:diamond: ($1.25, 5 players)
      SB checks, BB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $0.50, BTN calls $0.50, SB folds, BB folds, UTG+1 folds

      Turn: 7:club: ($2.25, 2 players)
      Hero checks, BTN bets $2, Hero folds

      Final Pot: $2.25

      BTN wins $4.15 ( won +$1.40 )
      SB lost -$0.25
      BB lost -$0.25
      UTG+1 lost -$0.25
      Hero lost -$0.75
  • 5 replies
    • cindy1985
      Joined: 13.11.2007 Posts: 358
      why fold????
    • hungary
      Joined: 10.03.2007 Posts: 1,414
      I imagined a 45. :rolleyes:
    • TimothyVdp1
      Joined: 11.12.2007 Posts: 5,820
      never fold a set unless the board is 4flush or something like that or you have 66 and the board is AA6TT
      45 is one hand of his entire range+you have outs against it
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343
      I´d bet turn for value+ you´re facing shortstack, so even if he happens to hit his straigth, you´re only risking to loose 36BB.
      Don´t see monsters if board is getting a little bit more drawy and if he re-raises, then you can decide if you want to fold or go with your hand. I´m happy to get it all-in on that board.
    • Michailewic
      Joined: 28.04.2008 Posts: 1,418
      It is very unlikely that BU would have limped in with 45. If BU did not have only 38BB but i.e. at least 70BB It would be possible to limp in with 45s. Therefore, I would not have afraid of 45.

      You should have raised at least $0.8 for protection against flush (since you had four opponents, $1 would be sufficient.

      His bet on the turn could be some kind of protection against flush draw (since you checked on the turn, your bet on the flop could be considered as block bet and he might have put you on flush draw).

      At maximum I would have only afraid that he was holding 99. I think that with 77 he would have probaly fold against four oponents on the flop (since there were only limpers and it was possible that at least one of them has better hand because of bet on the flop). However, I would willing to accept such risk.

      And you should have bet the turn for value and also for protection since you gave BU good pot odds for flush draw.

      You should have definitelly at least call $2. Even if he had a streight, you had 10 outs (9 outs for hull house and 1 out for four of kind), i.e. your odds were 1:3.5 that you beat him. If he had had staight, he would be willing to put his remaining $6.8 (If you had called, a pot would be $6.25). Therefore, in case he was holding a straight, your implied pot odds were 2 : (4.25+6.8) , i.e. 1:5.525.