This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL20-NL50] JJ against shove blind

    • mlatasrb
      mlatasrb
      Platinum
      Joined: 01.04.2012 Posts: 2,730
      iPoker - $0.20 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

      BB: 73.75 BB
      UTG: 100 BB
      MP: 94.35 BB
      CO: 41.5 BB
      Hero (BTN): 99 BB
      SB: 120.65 BB

      SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

      Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has J:heart: J:spade:

      fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 2 BB, SB raises to 7 BB, fold, Hero raises to 14 BB, SB raises to 120.65 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 85 BB

      Flop: (199 BB, 2 players) 5:heart: 2:diamond: 7:heart:

      Turn: (199 BB, 2 players) K:club:

      River: (199 BB, 2 players) 7:spade:

      Hero mucks J:heart: J:spade: (Two Pair, Jacks and Sevens) (Pre 56%, Flop 73%, Turn 5%)
      SB shows K:diamond: Q:heart: (Two Pair, Kings and Sevens) (Pre 44%, Flop 27%, Turn 95%)
      SB wins 189.05 BB


      508 hands 27/22, 3bet 10 from sb 11, against BU 26
      I saw him once 3betting AK and shoving, and once 3betting 56s, thats all.

      Is it ok 4bet/call? Or maybe better call IP. He cbets 60% flop (3/5), and turn 0/3, there is high chance if I call to face overcard, and he doesnt pay me off.


      how to addapt in future against him, since he shoves KQo ? Is it ok to call AQ+, TT+? I dont know if to pay attention to this, because it can be that he is tilted, or that he saw me often 4betting.
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      BogdanPS
      Basic
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi mla,

      This really comes down to the math behind the hand.

      We get 43% pot odds so we have to compare that to how our hand does versus a range he may stack off with.

      This is all because the preflop raise and 3-bet (and then 4-bet) are a lot smaller than your average.

      I think that 4-betting for value here is most likely +EV and better than just calling (in a spot where villain is most likely 3-betting a wider range for value, given we min raise).