[NL2-NL10] Set of 44

    • cozacu
      Joined: 14.02.2010 Posts: 1,379
      $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
      6 Players
      Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

      UTG ($10.70) 107bb
      UTG+1 ($16.50) 165bb
      cozacu (CO) ($10.15) 102bb
      BTN ($13.42) 134bb
      SB ($7.17) 72bb
      BB ($10) 100bb

      Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) cozacu is CO 4:spade: 4:club:
      2 folds, cozacu raises to $0.30, 1 fold, SB calls $0.25, 1 fold

      Flop: 2:club: 4:heart: 9:heart: ($0.65, 2 players)
      SB checks, cozacu bets $0.40, SB calls $0.40

      Turn: 6:spade: ($1.45, 2 players)
      SB checks, cozacu bets $1.20, SB calls $1.20

      River: A:heart: ($3.85, 2 players)
      SB goes all-in $5.27, cozacu says "ffs", cozacu folds

      Final Pot: $9.12

      SB wins $8.98 (net +$1.86)

      cozacu lost $1.90

      villain 13/8 af 0.8 53hands

      PF= standard open

      Flop= value

      Turn= value

      River= snap fold.

      Well, i though if this passive villain insta overbet shoves river I`m pretty sure I`m beat... I don't think he`ll x/call flop+turn to bluff shove river... A9 would be a posibility but i think he would rather think a second with that hand because the river completed a flush.

      Question: What do you think about the snap fold?
  • 1 reply
    • Kaitz20
      Joined: 02.02.2007 Posts: 27,343

      Since villain overbet shove river, I think fold is better than call. He needs to be turning middle pp-s into bluffs and I don´t think he would play that way A9. Pot is not that big that you should herocall him (especially consider that his stats are tight and mostly he end up having flush (likely smt KhQh)

      best regards,