[NL2-NL10] KK vs loose

    • yaxkukmian
      Joined: 24.12.2007 Posts: 2,020
      Only 15 hands but plays 47/33/ 0 folds to 3bet (just 2 hands but still)

      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.10(BB) Replayer
      Hero ($11.37)
      BB ($10.06)
      UTG ($7.13)
      UTG+1 ($5.11)
      CO ($10.05)
      BTN ($10)

      Dealt to Hero K:spade: K:diamond:

      fold, UTG+1 raises to $0.30, fold, fold, Hero raises to $1, fold, UTG+1 calls $0.70

      FLOP ($2.10) 5:heart: 7:heart: T:heart:

      Hero bets $10.37 (AI), UTG+1 calls $4.11 (AI)

      TURN ($10.32) 5:heart: 7:heart: T:heart: 9:diamond:

      RIVER ($10.32) 5:heart: 7:heart: T:heart: 9:diamond: 5:spade:

      UTG+1 shows 9:club: 9:heart:
      (Pre 20%, Flop 43.9%, Turn 97.7%)

      Hero shows K:spade: K:diamond:
      (Pre 80%, Flop 56.1%, Turn 2.3%)

      UTG+1 wins $9.64

      I didn't 3b more preflop since he's midstack and we can get it in postflop quite easily I think.

      Flop is super ugly for us. There are many T that we hate and he could call cbet and fold on T if blank 2 :diamond: hits for example. I go for shove to get the value from his TP range hand but mostly against his xx one :heart: . Didn't even bother with equilab to construct his range but he's calling with many FD here also right?

      What if I went for normal cbet of $1,65? We're still going broke on any no :heart: turn I think?
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi Yax,

      Preflop: looks fine

      Postflop: The shove is great here versus stations which we don't know about villain.

      I much more prefer a "standard" cbet that can induce shove from weaker hands or light calls. And then we ship non heart turns.