[NL20-NL50] NL20 SH TT f3bet

    • SPeedFANat1c
      SPeedFANat1c
      Gold
      Joined: 04.01.2009 Posts: 5,071
      Grabbed by Holdem Manager
      NL Holdem $0.20(BB) Replayer
      SB ($10.60)
      BB ($21.84)
      UTG ($36.50)
      Hero ($21)
      BTN ($20.40)

      Dealt to Hero T:diamond: T:heart:

      fold, Hero raises to $0.60, fold, SB raises to $1.60, fold, fold

      SB wins $1.40

      27/23, 3bet 0 (9), 27h

      not too tight fold? If he was full stack, I would have called, for set value and in case he decided to bluff first time.
  • 5 replies
    • EmanuelC16
      EmanuelC16
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.01.2010 Posts: 13,897
      Hey,

      Is he a midstacker or a random with this stack sizes? Vs midstacker it's a 4bet usually and vs a random it's a call I think. You have too good odds with your hand to fold. He didn't 3bet yet but it was only 27 hands so far, don't judge stats too much after so few hands.
    • SPeedFANat1c
      SPeedFANat1c
      Gold
      Joined: 04.01.2009 Posts: 5,071
      still I think out of 9 situations to have 0 means someting. Of couse its not 0 in real, but we can guess that its towards tight range I think.

      I don't know if he is midstacker, but most likely random fish I think. I don't detect good midstackers at this site, or I am not familiar enought how to detect them.
    • EmanuelC16
      EmanuelC16
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.01.2010 Posts: 13,897
      In that case you can call because he is giving you great odds. If he is a random more fishy guy your TT will play well enough IP here. Vs his overpairs you get quite good set mining odds plus you win against AK, KQ, AQ type hands as well. You can approach carefully when you don't flop a set and expect loads of value when you do.

      Against a standard sized 3bet this would be a fold imo but he made it too small to consider folding imo.
    • jachis
      jachis
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.04.2008 Posts: 745
      I would like to add that you shouldnt do any assumptions other than hes not a maniac when his 3bet is 0/9, after this hand it will be 1/10 which is 10%.

      It would be bad to assume before this hand that he 3bets very rarely and afterwards that he 3bets 10%
    • SPeedFANat1c
      SPeedFANat1c
      Gold
      Joined: 04.01.2009 Posts: 5,071
      actgually good point. Now I even remember this stat was 10 after this hand :)

      But on the ohterh and - people how have longterm 3bet stat of 10 - would they fold 9 times in a row?

      Or he had to have really bad spots for 3bet.