[NL20-NL50] QQ on A hi

    • GingerKid
      Joined: 05.08.2007 Posts: 5,587
      iPoker - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

      BB: 216.34 BB (VPIP: 20.29, PFR: 16.80, 3Bet Preflop: 7.82, Hands: 2,246)
      CO: 109.32 BB (VPIP: 22.38, PFR: 18.18, 3Bet Preflop: 2.44, Hands: 148)
      BTN: 101.5 BB (VPIP: 24.30, PFR: 21.23, 3Bet Preflop: 10.49, Hands: 368)
      Hero (SB): 101.28 BB

      Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

      Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Q:diamond: Q:club:

      CO raises to 3.5 BB, fold, Hero calls 3 BB, fold

      Flop: (8 BB, 2 players) T:diamond: A:spade: 4:club:
      Hero checks, CO bets 6 BB, Hero calls 6 BB

      Turn: (20 BB, 2 players) 9:club:
      Hero checks, CO checks

      River: (20 BB, 2 players) T:club:
      Hero checks, CO bets 20 BB, Hero calls 20 BB

      CO shows 5:spade: 5:club: (Two Pair, Tens and Fives) (Pre 19%, Flop 10%, Turn 5%)
      Hero shows Q:diamond: Q:club: (Two Pair, Queens and Tens) (Pre 81%, Flop 90%, Turn 95%)
      Hero wins 57 BB

      Last hand I saw him cbetting pot size on Q high, so now when he cbets 3/4 I think it is more often bluff. when he checks turn it is most likely not Ax hand, and river he tries to tell me he has Tx or flush, so I guess I have odds to call?
      I didnt 3bet preflop because he folds 90%, and since I saw him that he bets pot size, I thought I can get more money in 2bet pot.
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779

      Preflop: Not a huge fan of calling in the SB but if you want to make an exploitive play here and use a very bluff-heavy 3betting range I think it's reasonable.

      Flop: Easy c/c

      River: This is the bottom of your range. We can have a ton of AX hands here, I think you may even show up with some full houses or TX going for a checkraise. I would fold here. IMO people don't take the bet check bet line as a bluff too often.

      If you have a read then you can go ahead and call. But I think your read is extremely weak here and is based on very weak assumptions.