[NL20-NL50] nl 50 QQo FR

    • sandraardnas
      Joined: 11.01.2012 Posts: 2,034
      Poker Stars, $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 7 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      SB: $83.19 (166.4 bb)
      Hero (BB): $50 (100 bb)
      MP1: $19.25 (38.5 bb)
      MP2: $58.91 (117.8 bb)
      MP3: $20 (40 bb)
      CO: $107.73 (215.5 bb)
      BTN: $50 (100 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is BB with Q Q
      3 folds, CO calls $0.50, 2 folds, Hero raises to $2.50, CO calls $2

      Flop: ($5.25) J 7 8 (2 players)
      Hero bets $4, CO raises to $10, Hero folds

      $13.25 pot ($0.60 rake)
      Final Board: J 7 8
      Hero mucked Q Q and lost (-$6.50 net)
      CO mucked and won $12.65 ($6.15 net)

      pre im isolating agressive fish:

      and I was planning to do some check/calls on dry boards, but this board changed plan cause here he can have milion worse hands that will call and generally people are making more calling than betting mistakes. I didnt have huge sample, so maybe hes not as agressive as it seems, so I decide to just bet, bet, bet. But what if he raises? I think on this structure he has so much better hands so I think its bet/fold even vs agresive fish.
      I also thought about check/raise for a while, but again he has lot of monsters and didnt want to stackoff on such board.
  • 2 replies
    • cutegoldfish
      Joined: 19.11.2009 Posts: 4,335
      hes a passive fish i expect him to call on this board and not bet so i like the plan of betting all streets. check raising is a bad plan because he is usually just going to check back.

      however when he raises its very strong and usually 2p or better so we can fold.
    • sandraardnas
      Joined: 11.01.2012 Posts: 2,034
      so you are just assuming he is passive despite 9/10 wwsf and agr% 80, donk 2/3, and bet when checked 3/3, because sample of hands is too little?