This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl2 Sh - Aa

    • TJtheTJ
      Joined: 12.10.2011 Posts: 6,587
      IPoker, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
      Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

      CO: $2.16 (108 bb)
      BTN: $2.39 (119.5 bb)
      SB: $2.52 (126 bb)
      BB: $1.99 (99.5 bb)
      Hero (MP): $2.42 (121 bb)

      Preflop: Hero is MP with A A
      Hero raises to $0.06, CO calls $0.06, 2 folds, BB calls $0.04

      Flop: ($0.19) 2 Q 2 (3 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $0.12, CO calls $0.12, BB folds

      Turn: ($0.43) K (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.28, CO calls $0.28

      River: ($0.99) K (2 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $0.32, Hero calls $0.32

      $1.63 pot ($0.10 rake)
      Final Board: 2 Q 2 K K
      CO showed K A and won $1.53 ($0.75 net)
      Hero mucked A A and lost (-$0.78 net)

      Villain is 79/0 over 90 hands.
      BB is 65/24 over 17 hands.

      Against the super loose passive fish, can we value bet this river again? Or is check/call better? Or even check/fold?

      I think the biggest problem with check/call is that he is passive, so he probably has us beat if he bets here, whereas he can probably call with something like 88 or Qx when we bet ourselves.

      When he bet so small I decided to call anyway since I was just getting such good odds.
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,779

      I think you should just fire thrice. I don't think he has the King really often and when the king double pairs with all the flush draws missing, I really doubt that he ever folds QX here. He won't give u credit for a King too often and that's what passive fish love doing.

      I think your bet size is too small too. You can probably 3barrel with a 80% pot bet on every street.