[NL2-NL10] NL5 FR AKo 3bet pot, turn spot - vs small bet

    • Dawidas888
      Joined: 22.06.2009 Posts: 826
      Known Players:
      MP1: €4.69 - 94 bb
      MP2: €5.46 - 109 bb
      MP3: €6.24 - 125 bb
      CO: €2.87 - 57 bb
      BU: €5.00 - 100 bb
      SB: €5.07 - 101 bb
      BB: €9.27 - 185 bb

      0.02/0.05 No Limit Hold'em (7 Handed)
      Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 1.1.508.2

      Preflop: Hero is BB with A:club: , K:spade:
      SB posts small blind (€0.02), Hero posts big blind (€0.05), 3 folds, CO calls, 2 folds, Hero raises for €0.25, CO calls

      Flop: (€0.62 - 12.40 bb) 6:diamond: , 6:club: , 5:club: (2 Players)
      Hero bets €0.30, CO calls

      Turn: (€1.22 - 24.40 bb) J:diamond: (2 Players)
      Hero checks, CO bets €0.45, Hero ???


      CO was 26/5/4 over 59.

      I should have made my cbet a little bit bigger (for some reason I thought the pot was smaller).

      I think it's possible that this was induced by my small cbet.
      Even if my OC's are live I have roughly 12% equity and I do not have the right odds. Do I have implieds though?
      It's possible that he calls if the river is a K, not sure about an A. Also, I have reversed implied odds vs flushes.
      So folding seems like the safest (best?) play.
  • 1 reply
    • mbml
      Joined: 27.11.2008 Posts: 20,694

      AK high has good SD value vs a wide range. And villain is bad so I doubt he'll put in 3 barrels here. I'll probably c/c twice by default - I think he will bluff often enough to make this play +EV.

      AK cannot really bluff out better hands - Pairs are never folding
      AK rarely gets value from worse - Maybe he calls with some worse Ace highs occasionally and calls with draws which are underdogs vs AK high but he'll bluff on a later street

      So the best play is to check/call. Betting makes more sense vs a tougher opponent who is not letting you showdown your hand all the time.