[NL2-NL10] NL25 9 outs, 3 to 1 pot odds.

    • DaPhunk
      Joined: 01.03.2008 Posts: 2,805
      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)        

      0.10/0.25 No-Limit Hold'em (10 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with Q:spade: , A:spade:
      2 folds, Hero raises to $1.00, MP1 calls $1.00, 6 folds.

      Flop: ($2.35) 8:diamond: , T:club: , J:club: (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.50, MP1 raises to $5.00, Hero raises to $3.65 (All-In).

      Turn: ($11.00) 4:club:
      River: ($11.00) A:diamond:

      Final Pot: $11.00

      Results follow (highlight to see):
      MP1 shows [ 9h, 9c ] a pair of Nines
      Hero shows [ Qs, As ] a pair of Aces
      MP1 wins $1.35 USD with a pair of Nines.
      Hero wins $9.17 USD with a pair of Aces.

      Whilst playing this hand i decided that i could actually call the reraise because the pot was big enough and against a loose opponent i thought i still had high card outs.
      More precisely any A, K or Q would give me top hand. I had also just seen this opponent make a purebluff reraise the turn before with nothing and QJs.
  • 3 replies
    • veriz
      Joined: 20.07.2008 Posts: 65,504
      I would have folded the hand and save the money :P but nice catch! Lets see what judges think about such moves.
    • 098799
      Joined: 23.07.2007 Posts: 1,245
      How did you calculated the 9 outs? I can see 8 for double belly buster (9 and K for str8) and 6 for overcads, so a lot more. Of course not every of them might be clean, but I think the amount that is, is clearly sufficient to call here.

      Oh, now I know. I tell you something - newer post results! They can't help us in judging you hand before you knew them! So on the flop you maybe had 9 outs but you had no clue you did, right?
    • DaPhunk
      Joined: 01.03.2008 Posts: 2,805
      Hahaha, you're right, i dunno how i didn't see i had more than 9 outs before your reply 098799.

      Looks like I still have a way to go on evaluating my hand on the flop heh!