[NL2-NL10] NL10 6max Axs flush draw

    • ilioas
      Joined: 24.11.2008 Posts: 305
      iPoker - £0.10 NL - Holdem - 6 players
      Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

      Hero (BTN): £14.96
      SB: £11.47
      BB: £11.77 24/9 500 hands Af0.8
      UTG: £23.34 31/4 100 hands Af1.5
      MP: £1.45
      CO: £10.03

      SB posts SB £0.05, BB posts BB £0.10

      Pre Flop: (£0.15) Hero has 9:heart: A:heart:

      UTG calls £0.10, fold, fold, Hero raises to £0.40, fold, BB calls £0.30, UTG calls £0.30

      Flop: (£1.25, 3 players) 2:club: Q:heart: 8:heart:
      BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets £1.10, BB calls £1.10, UTG calls £1.10

      Turn: (£4.55, 3 players) 2:spade:
      BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets £3.50, fold, UTG raises to £7.00, Hero calls £3.50

      River: (£18.55, 2 players) 3:club:
      UTG bets £13.40, fold

      UTG wins £17.32

      For unknown reason EUR and Pound tables feels much tougher than $ ones. Can someone comment?

      Opening from button feels ok.

      And again the situation about Cbetting.

      I block some AQ hands, I have flush draw, one overcard - I felt like Cbetting multiple streets.

      When min raised on turn - I called to see river and hit my flush.
      I guess folding is fine. Though - a lot of bb has been put in.
  • 1 reply
    • BogdanPS
      Joined: 12.05.2010 Posts: 27,588
      Hi ilioas,

      Preflop: looks fine

      Postflop: We have two guys calling us on a somewhat wet board so the question is: what's the value of the bet on the turn?

      Since the board is already paired I think folding the turn is fine.

      Now, to answer your question, the Euro and Pound tables shouldn't be any tougher. It may be a sample size issue (in fact a lot of people say that the Euro tables are softer).