This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] nl2 66

    • Stu24023
      Stu24023
      Bronze
      Joined: 31.05.2012 Posts: 407
      Could i of gotten away from this? no reads or info!

      Hand converted with online PokerStrategy.com hand converter:

      Play hand

      $0.01/$0.02 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)

      Known players:
      BU:
      $2.00
      SB:
      $2.73
      BB:
      $1.08
      UTG1:
      $2.00
      UTG2:
      $3.70
      MP1:
      $0.91
      MP2:
      $2.00
      MP3:
      $2.32
      CO (Hero):
      $2.17


      Preflop: Hero is CO with 6, 6.
      UTG1 folds, UTG2 raises to $0.10, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.10, BU calls $0.10, 2 folds, BB folds.

      Flop: ($0.33) 9, T, 6 (3 players)
      UTG2 checks, Hero bets $0.24, BU calls $0.24, UTG2 folds.

      Turn: ($0.81) A (2 players)
      Hero bets $0.58, BU calls $0.58.

      River: ($1.97) 2 (2 players)
      Hero bets $1.08, BU calls $1.08(All-In).

      Final Pot: $4.13.
      Results follow:

      BU shows three of a kind, tens(T T).
      Hero shows three of a kind, sixes(6 6).

      BU wins with three of a kind, tens(T T).
  • 1 reply
    • kymupa
      kymupa
      Bronze
      Joined: 22.10.2009 Posts: 22,364
      Hello,

      Not really.

      Set over set is usually going to cost our stack especially on NL2, but this doesn't mean that going broke is bad - there are worse hands that are going to call us down here.

      Nice hand!

      Best,
      Plamen