Rake FL

  • 4 replies
    • redskwerl
      redskwerl
      Black
      Joined: 03.03.2008 Posts: 3,802
      stars has the lowest rake
      ipoker rake levels have almost completely killed fixed limit on that network
    • donkament
      donkament
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.07.2007 Posts: 206
      Hey GussGuss From my database I can see that I have payed arround 2.7-2.9 Big Bets per 100 hands. I only play on pokerstars atm.
    • floaty
      floaty
      Bronze
      Joined: 13.04.2010 Posts: 893
      I thought iPoker had the lowest rake on fixed limit, and when comparing, using tool provided here in analysing rake for different sites, it seems lower than on pokerstars. However, I've only compared micro so cant say for sure about higher limits. But my own calculations are the same, iPoker is lower on rake. But theres no traffic for fixed limit...
    • DAIMA2
      DAIMA2
      Gold
      Joined: 12.04.2011 Posts: 43
      1 you write at GOOGLE. POKERSTARS rake and open the first
      2 if you want to know where it is better to play not forget if you dont want to play
      little times you must take into consideration and the return you get i.e at POKERSTARS what you get from store depending of how much you pla.y So if 1 site had less rake than. other and the second gives more advantages because of your play you must compute
      Nobody else cant because that depending of how much you play