[NL2-NL10] NL25 Freeplay

    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Known players:
      SB:
      $7,20
      Hero:
      $5,00
      UTG1:
      $38,90
      UTG2:
      $19,65
      MP1:
      $15,45
      MP2:
      $25,00
      MP3:
      $31,35
      CO:
      $20,85
      BU:
      $25,00

      0,1/0,25 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.67 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 5:club: , 4:heart:
      UTG1 calls $0,25, 4 folds, CO calls $0,25, 2 folds, Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0,85) 8:heart: , 5:diamond: , 8:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero checks, UTG1 checks, CO checks.

      Turn: ($0,85) 4:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero bets $0,75, UTG1 calls $0,75, CO raises to $1,75, Hero raises to $4,75 (All-In), UTG1 calls $4,00, CO calls $3,00.

      River: ($15,10) 5:heart: (3 players)
      UTG1 bets $3,00, CO calls $3,00.

      Final Pot: $21,10

      Should I have folded to such resistance on Turn? The board is pretty drawy and there are 2 opponents.
  • 7 replies
    • Gerv
      Gerv
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 17,678
      Hi Dandycall,

      Any PP >66 has you beat due the paired board. With that in mind plus Flush/Straight possibilities, I am inclined to play this passively OOP as in c/c accordingly

      I honestly would fold on a reraise but I am not betting on the Turn at all

      Best regards,
      Gerv
    • alejandrosh
      alejandrosh
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.07.2008 Posts: 4,346
      you have effectibly a pair of 5 , that's nothing to go all in with
    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
    • IngolPoker
      IngolPoker
      Black
      Joined: 05.09.2006 Posts: 10,467
      i dont even bet here, too, this hand is just too weak
    • barrelhead
      barrelhead
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 95
      Originally posted by dandycal
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
      Hi,

      do you mean, that you didn't know you had full-house or are you talking about turn? If you're talking about turn, how come you didn't have 2pair? I'm confused :)

      Thanks for explanation,
      BH
    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Originally posted by barrelhead
      Originally posted by dandycal
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
      Hi,

      do you mean, that you didn't know you had full-house or are you talking about turn? If you're talking about turn, how come you didn't have 2pair? I'm confused :)

      Thanks for explanation,
      BH
      Hi Barrelhead,

      I'm talking about the turn, yes. I don't have 2-pair here because there is a higher pair on the board. So my game is actually 88 55 4. The 44 counts for nothing here because of the higher 88. =D
    • barrelhead
      barrelhead
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 95
      Ahh, I see. I overlooked that 88 pair on the flop :O It's clear now. Thanks.