This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL25 Freeplay

    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Known players:
      SB:
      $7,20
      Hero:
      $5,00
      UTG1:
      $38,90
      UTG2:
      $19,65
      MP1:
      $15,45
      MP2:
      $25,00
      MP3:
      $31,35
      CO:
      $20,85
      BU:
      $25,00

      0,1/0,25 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.67 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 5:club: , 4:heart:
      UTG1 calls $0,25, 4 folds, CO calls $0,25, 2 folds, Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0,85) 8:heart: , 5:diamond: , 8:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero checks, UTG1 checks, CO checks.

      Turn: ($0,85) 4:diamond: (3 players)
      Hero bets $0,75, UTG1 calls $0,75, CO raises to $1,75, Hero raises to $4,75 (All-In), UTG1 calls $4,00, CO calls $3,00.

      River: ($15,10) 5:heart: (3 players)
      UTG1 bets $3,00, CO calls $3,00.

      Final Pot: $21,10

      Should I have folded to such resistance on Turn? The board is pretty drawy and there are 2 opponents.
  • 7 replies
    • Gerv
      Gerv
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 17,678
      Hi Dandycall,

      Any PP >66 has you beat due the paired board. With that in mind plus Flush/Straight possibilities, I am inclined to play this passively OOP as in c/c accordingly

      I honestly would fold on a reraise but I am not betting on the Turn at all

      Best regards,
      Gerv
    • alejandrosh
      alejandrosh
      Bronze
      Joined: 02.07.2008 Posts: 4,346
      you have effectibly a pair of 5 , that's nothing to go all in with
    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
    • IngolPoker
      IngolPoker
      Black
      Joined: 05.09.2006 Posts: 10,485
      i dont even bet here, too, this hand is just too weak
    • barrelhead
      barrelhead
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 95
      Originally posted by dandycal
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
      Hi,

      do you mean, that you didn't know you had full-house or are you talking about turn? If you're talking about turn, how come you didn't have 2pair? I'm confused :)

      Thanks for explanation,
      BH
    • dandycal
      dandycal
      Bronze
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Originally posted by barrelhead
      Originally posted by dandycal
      OMG, only now I realise I do not have two pair here. I wonder if I made that mistake during the play, or only when I was reviewing it.

      The mistake here is pretty obvious, thanks.
      Hi,

      do you mean, that you didn't know you had full-house or are you talking about turn? If you're talking about turn, how come you didn't have 2pair? I'm confused :)

      Thanks for explanation,
      BH
      Hi Barrelhead,

      I'm talking about the turn, yes. I don't have 2-pair here because there is a higher pair on the board. So my game is actually 88 55 4. The 44 counts for nothing here because of the higher 88. =D
    • barrelhead
      barrelhead
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 95
      Ahh, I see. I overlooked that 88 pair on the flop :O It's clear now. Thanks.