This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] Nl 25 Aj

    • dandycal
      Joined: 10.10.2008 Posts: 1,711
      Known players:    

      0,1/0,25 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.67 by

      Preflop: Hero is SB with J:club: , A:club:
      UTG2 calls $0,25, MP1 calls $0,25, 4 folds, Hero raises to $1,50, BB raises to $5,00, UTG2 raises to $14,40 (All-In), MP1 folds, Hero calls $3,25 (All-In), BB calls $9,40.

      Flop: ($33,80) 4:club: , 4:spade: , J:diamond:
      Turn: ($33,80) 8:spade:
      River: ($33,80) 5:heart: (3 players)

      Final Pot: $33,80

      Push according to stack ratio. Standard?
  • 6 replies
    • dadude77
      Joined: 26.10.2008 Posts: 1,516
      I fold here. I think you need <2.5x original raise to stack you have a little >3. The articles are different now, but I still think its a fold.

      This is what the articles say now.

      an opponent reraised behind you.
      TT, JJ, QQ, KK, AA, and AK

      So I cant check, but I believe it was 2.5 times
    • barrelhead
      Joined: 29.01.2009 Posts: 95
      Oh well, I'm probably blind, so nvm :)
    • Gafny
      Joined: 05.11.2008 Posts: 337
      erm his ratio is more like 2-2.2
      against UTG2 limping and then re-reraising youre most likely calling into a monster so even with ratio being on your side i fold unless i have reads on reraisers that tells me to call :P
    • TheBu11d0g
      Joined: 25.07.2008 Posts: 2,019
      Hey dandycal,

      Your push was correct according to the remaining stack:original raise ratio as you had 2.16, although wih the re-raise and re-re-raise from the BB and UTG2 you are most likely facing QQ+, AK where you will be a massive underdog so you could quite rightly fold here as well imo.

    • dadude77
      Joined: 26.10.2008 Posts: 1,516
      ...... yeah, i read this really late, i was looking at your original stack size...... im dumb :D

      hahahah my bad :D
    • Gerv
      Joined: 07.05.2008 Posts: 17,678
      Thinkin logically about ranges, just muck your AJs because someone 3bets and then another guy 4betshoves.

      3better has at worst AQ+,TT+
      4better has at worst QQ+,AK+

      Concerning equity you have to call [(4.75x3)+0.35 ]x0.95 :3,25
      13.87 :3.25
      4.25 :1

      2,072,580,048 games 3.844 secs 539,172,749 games/sec


      equity win tie pots won pots tied
      Hand 0: 18.585% 18.04% 00.55% 373799268 11380318.00 { AJs }
      Hand 1: 33.239% 30.49% 02.75% 631954812 56958466.00 { JJ+, AKs, AKo }
      Hand 2: 48.176% 45.60% 02.58% 945041544 53445640.00 { QQ+, AKs }

      Mathematically it is on the borderline but shoving a 19bb stack for just 19% winchance is just crazy-all-in.

      Sometimes playing by the book is causing high variance and more marginal spots than if you would think outside the box.

      You see utg+2 limp/4bet which is kinda dubious.

      I prefer mucking and rebuying to 19bb again rather than shoving 19bb for 18% winchance

      Best regards,