[NL2-NL10] 38o NL10

    • Sonydahaka
      Joined: 22.06.2008 Posts: 392
      $0.05/$0.1 No Limit Holdem
      5 players
      Converted at weaktight.com

      UTG ($7.75)
      CO ($6.40)
      BTN ($12.10)
      SB ($9.90)
      Hero (BB) ($20.85)

      Pre-flop: ($0.15, 5 players) Hero is BB 3:spade: 8:spade:
      1 fold, CO calls $0.10, 2 folds, Hero checks

      Flop: 3:club: 8:diamond: K:spade: ($0.25, 2 players)
      Hero bets $0.20, CO calls $0.20

      Turn: 6:diamond: ($0.65, 2 players)
      Hero bets $0.60, CO raises to $1.20, Hero calls $0.60

      River: 5:heart: ($3.05, 2 players)
      Hero checks, CO bets $3, Hero calls $3

      [Results Hidden]

      After villain re-raises on the turn i thought that maybe he had a set, but the difficult decision was on the river, here i wasn't sure that i have the best hand? I didn't want to invest more money although he had aprox. 2$ left in his stack. Should i put him all in on the river?
  • 3 replies
    • soucy
      Joined: 28.11.2006 Posts: 2,092
      Putting villain all in at the river would be overplayed.

      I actualy really think about folding this river ps bet. Villain can easily have a set or a Kx two pair. I don't really see hands which we have beat playing this line except of a pure bluff.
    • Sonydahaka
      Joined: 22.06.2008 Posts: 392
      Villain had Ak, semifishy.
    • TheBrood
      Joined: 17.07.2008 Posts: 4,383
      Originally posted by Sonydahaka
      Villain had Ak, semifishy.
      extremely fishy if you ask me. Midstack? Limp AK? Slowplay TP?

      Stats can help you a lot with these decisions. If hes aggro he can do this with 2xdiamonds but its unlikely.

      I think I like your line since his minraise could mean a draw and your check on river induces a bluff since draws missed. A set would prob raise more on turn for protection.