[NL2-NL10] NL10 - AA vs LAG

    • PetterG2
      Joined: 12.10.2008 Posts: 224
      Known players:

      0,05/0,1 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.67 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

      Preflop: Hero is UTG1 with A:club: , A:heart:
      Hero raises to $0,40, 5 folds, BU calls $0,40, SB folds, BB calls $0,30.

      Flop: ($1,25) 4:spade: , T:heart: , 3:spade: (3 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets $0,80, BU calls $0,80, BB folds.

      Turn: ($2,85) Q:heart: (2 players)
      Hero bets $1,80, BU calls $1,80.

      River: ($6,45) 8:spade: (2 players)
      Hero checks, BU bets $8,25 (All-In), Hero folds, BU gets uncalled bet back.

      Final Pot: $6,45

      My thoughts:

      pre: Standard
      Flop: maybe I should go to 1 $ or something because of possible FD
      Turn: Should probably have been a little bigger here as well. Like 2,2 $ ?
      River: Since he just called all the way I thought the chance of him having a flush here is high. The only thing that bothered me is that LAG-players often makes small bets when they acculy got a hand, but that's not of course all of them and since I didn't have so many hands on him I ended up folding.
  • 1 reply
    • Fongie
      Joined: 02.12.2006 Posts: 4,978
      Flop: I would bet $1

      Turn: I would bet a little more than $2

      River: I would play c/f actually. Pretty weak maybe, but this guy looks like he isn't aggressive enough (or maybe smart enough :P ) to bluff this river, but would rather check behind with whatever he could be calling down. If he bets you're beaten here imo, and pot is too big to play bet/fold.. so I'd C/F

      By the way, you can't call this guy a LAG... he's much too passive and doesn't raise enough preflop.