Rake at lower limits

    • irregularity
      irregularity
      Bronze
      Joined: 23.05.2008 Posts: 233
      Hi guys!

      I am currently playing 0.10/0.20 FLFR at Mansion and would like to compare rakes with other sites could you post your stats here please.

      Mine works out as 2.9BB/100, which I was rather shocked by tbh. Kinda makes me mad because I would be running above 5BB/100 even if the rake was just ~2BB/100.

      If you do not have a BB/100 stat for rake, here is how to calculate.

      Take your rake, divide it by the number of hands you have played, multiply it by 100 and divide once again by your big bet amount.

      Please include level you play and site, thanks.
  • 3 replies
    • DarthBobo
      DarthBobo
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.09.2007 Posts: 1,134
      2.9 BB/100 seems very low for that limit. If this is really true, don't change site! For example the rake at titanpoker at this limit is around 4.0BB/100.
    • CoreySteel
      CoreySteel
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.10.2006 Posts: 3,366
      Mansion isn't so good for rake. The best is of course PokerStars. But 2,9BB/100 doesn't seems so high. I guess that's it because you have such a low VPIP and PFR :)
    • opal99
      opal99
      Black
      Joined: 05.02.2008 Posts: 8,270
      Originally posted by DarthBobo
      2.9 BB/100 seems very low for that limit. If this is really true, don't change site! For example the rake at titanpoker at this limit is around 4.0BB/100.
      Titan & Mansion = iPoker network => they have the same tables, the same players and THE SAME rake.

      2.9 BB/100 is strange imo.. too low for this limit, so maybe just small samplesize?