This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

ICM treiner question

  • 4 replies
    • NickParkes
      NickParkes
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.07.2008 Posts: 1,526
      Yeah it is... that range is kinda wierd... 52s is also better than 72s... hmmm pokerstove has 88% range as

      22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,72s+,62s+,52s+,42s+,32s
      A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J2o+,T2o+,94o+,84o+,74o+,64o+,54o

      which includes all suited cards.... why are the ranges so different?
    • lulda
      lulda
      Bronze
      Joined: 07.03.2009 Posts: 399
      it's just running on different ranges

      not speaking about nash, I think it's a snap push considering villain is not calling lite enough (don't see a villain callin 40% way often - would say max 35%, even less)

      EDIT: I think good reg is capable of calling even wider (for some reason I thought that 40% is much wider than it actually is :f_p: )
    • viewer88
      viewer88
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.04.2008 Posts: 5,545
      You have to factor in that this is not equity vs ATC, this is your equity vs calling range for villain. I think that explains the weird results you get from time to time.
    • miskokvo
      miskokvo
      Bronze
      Joined: 28.03.2008 Posts: 1,502
      lol guys ... like it care if 72 is better than 62 omfg ... you taking poker math too serious :f_mad: