Texas Grab'em

    • Mugge88
      Mugge88
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.10.2006 Posts: 510
      Anyone else had problems with incorrect potsizes when using Texas Grab'em, and how to solve it (note the potsizes in this sample hand)?

      0,15/0,30 Fixed-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grab'em by www.pokerstrategy.cc.

      Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with A:club: , A:heart: . MP1 posts a blind of $0,15.
      Hero raises, UTG+2 folds, MP1 calls, 5 folds, BB calls.

      Flop: (6,47 SB) K:heart: , 8:club: , 7:spade: (3 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets, MP1 folds, BB calls.

      Turn: (4,23 BB) A:spade: (2 players)
      BB checks, Hero bets, BB calls.

      River: (6,23 BB) K:spade: (2 players)
      BB bets, Hero raises, BB 3-bets, Hero caps, BB calls.

      Final Pot: 14,23 BB
  • 15 replies
    • ciRith
      ciRith
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.03.2005 Posts: 18,556
      I see there no error.

      preflop: raise(2), coldcall(2), SB(0,5), callBB(2) = 6,5 - rake = 6,47
      flop: bet(1), call(1) = 8,47SB = 4,23BB
      turn: bet(1BB), call(1BB) = 6,23BB
      river: cap(4BB), call(4BB) = 14,23BB


      or what do you mean?
    • Mugge88
      Mugge88
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.10.2006 Posts: 510
      ahh.. minus the rake :P My bad :)

      Thanks Cirith
    • howard182
      howard182
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.10.2006 Posts: 416
      Texas Grab'em deducts rake throughout the hand? I think you've just pointed out its killer feature for me (okay, not really, the main thing that's been irritating me about hand recorder lately is quirky database support now that I've got PT... but the rake thing's definitely a bonus).
    • howard182
      howard182
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.10.2006 Posts: 416
      Not sure if I should make another thread for this, but I'm testing texas grab'em and it seems to not be deducting the rake as shown in the first post and also has a stats bug.


      Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)        
      Position:
      Stack
      UTG+1:
      $44.65
      Hero:
      $49.05

      0.25/0.50 No-Limit Hold'em (10 handed)
      Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grab'em by www.pokerstrategy.cc.

      Preflop: Hero is CO with K:diamond: , K:heart:
      UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.50, 2 folds, MP2 calls $0.50, MP3 folds, Hero raises to $2.75, 2 folds, BB calls $2.25, UTG+1 calls $2.25, MP2 calls $2.25.

      Flop: ($11.25) 5:club: , T:heart: , 4:spade: (4 players)
      BB checks, UTG+1 bets $8, 3 folds.

        I'm pretty sure I escaped from a set here, this kind of action from UTG+1 in this hand is very rare.

      Final Pot: $19.25

      The stats for UTG+1 there are wrong. I've got more hands from him just from today! Also, as you can see rake hasn't been taken into account for the pot sizes.
    • ciRith
      ciRith
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.03.2005 Posts: 18,556
      hmm maybe it only remove rake in limit hands? (I just take a guess ^^)
    • Mugge88
      Mugge88
      Bronze
      Joined: 29.10.2006 Posts: 510
      regarding his stats, couldn't the stats you see be the once you had while playing the hand, and then you collected more info afterwards? Just a guess here too :)
    • howard182
      howard182
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.10.2006 Posts: 416
      No, not really. The HUD disagreed with the hand count (even while being set to only consider FR hands at the same limit) by over 200 hands. That was why I noticed. All stats were off in a similar manner.
    • undercover82
      undercover82
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.12.2006 Posts: 813
      Does the program run relatively slow for anyone else? Is that gonna be fixed in the future?
    • howard182
      howard182
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.10.2006 Posts: 416
      It's pretty slow for me too, forgot to mention that after I discovered actual bugs. Particularly displaying hands seems to take a long time.
    • ciRith
      ciRith
      Bronze
      Joined: 25.03.2005 Posts: 18,556
      I had the same problem with the spped. But for me it wasn't the programm. It was my DB. I just deactivated the stats and now its running very fast. (My DB is just to big with over 100k Hands and 500MB :/ )
    • howard182
      howard182
      Bronze
      Joined: 30.10.2006 Posts: 416
      Since I've already (ab)used this thread for a different bug report than the original post, I might as well do it again:

      In version 1.7 the "Texas Grab'em" bar actually covers critical parts of the interface for me, namely the stats/stacks/results buttons, copy function (although two modes of this are thankfully available from the menu) and whatever else was there other than half the comment box.

      This is especially frustrating because said bar actually serves no purpose whatsoever.
    • undercover82
      undercover82
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.12.2006 Posts: 813
      Yes that happens to me too , it is infuriating mainly because i cant copy my hands into pokerstrategy format.
    • Stefan1000
      Stefan1000
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.01.2006 Posts: 1,649
      Thx for the feedback guys, forwarded it to our coders
    • undercover82
      undercover82
      Bronze
      Joined: 09.12.2006 Posts: 813
      Are there any news about the bug , stefan ?
    • Stefan1000
      Stefan1000
      Bronze
      Joined: 24.01.2006 Posts: 1,649
      Actually nothing new to me,

      BUT ill go and talk to the coder again if he will fix it soon.

      best regards,
      Stefan